My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2018
>
101618
>
12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2018 4:30:51 PM
Creation date
10/12/2018 4:30:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/16/2018
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Staff also recommends funding the Operating, Emergency and Drought Contingency reserves at target <br /> levels and leave the Rate Stabilization Reserve unfunded during this study period. While this is a <br /> reasonable approach to reduce customer impacts, it's recommended that the Agency fund water supply <br /> reliability projects and review the current reserve policy based on industry standards and practices. <br /> Under these assumptions,two additional scenarios have been developed. The two scenarios are: <br /> > Scenario 1 -(3%CPI+$3M for Water Supply Reliability Projects+Fully Funding Three <br /> Reserves at Target Levels+3.7%Rate Adjustments) <br /> > Scenario 2- (3%CPI+$3M for Water Supply Reliability Projects+Fully Funding Two <br /> Reserves at Target Levels and the Drought Contingency at the minimum level+3%Rate <br /> Adjustments) <br /> All scenarios include gradually increasing the fixed charge component from 35%to 45%by CY 2022. <br /> Cash flow and monthly customer impacts assuming 10, 15, and 20 CCF are shown for each scenario in <br /> the tables on the following pages. <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.