My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
09
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2018
>
090418
>
09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2018 2:23:28 PM
Creation date
8/24/2018 4:14:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/4/2018
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
215
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pleasanton Development Impact Fee Nexus Study <br /> Draft Report 07/12/18 <br /> The total cost of all projects is in the range of $216 million to $269 million. This analysis uses the <br /> higher end of the estimated transportation cost range, which is a conservative approach. <br /> Cost Allocation and Fee Calculation <br /> For each project, the cost to be included in the TIF program was calculated as the estimated <br /> project cost multiplied by the eligibility factor (thus accounting for existing deficiencies and direct <br /> developer contributions) and then multiplied by the Percent Pleasanton Trips, Adjusted. As <br /> shown at the bottom of Table 17, the final project costs eligible for funding through the TIF <br /> program is in the range of $137 to $154 million with the higher end of the estimate used in this <br /> analysis2. <br /> The cost attributable to new development in Pleasanton is distributed across the various land <br /> uses in order to determine a reasonable fee for each. A typical method for achieving this <br /> distribution is to develop a set of factors that relate the transportation demands of different land <br /> use categories to each other. Table 18 presents a set of factors for the land use categories that <br /> might occur in Pleasanton; these factors are drawn from the City of Pleasanton's Travel Demand <br /> Model, and an adjustment of 35 percent for pass-by trips is applied to retail uses. The resulting <br /> allocations and equivalency factors used in the nexus study are shown in Table 6. <br /> 2 The previous Transportation Fee included a credit for parcels within Hacienda Business Park. This <br /> credit was commonly referred to as the North Pleasanton Improvement District (NPID) fee. The NPID <br /> Fee was applied in place of the Pleasanton Transportation Development Fee for specific undeveloped <br /> parcels in Hacienda. The NPID fee was lower to account for Hacienda constructing several interchange <br /> projects. The number of parcels still eligible for the fee credit have reduced significantly since the <br /> credit was established in 1998 and a separate agreement will be used to ensure that the remaining <br /> properties are credited appropriately. As such, the NPID Fee is not included in this analysis. <br /> Economic&Planning Systems, Inc. 24 P:us1000s\151111PIeasantonFee1ReportUs1111_FeeNexus_O71218.docx <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.