My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
20
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2018
>
082118
>
20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2018 5:08:55 PM
Creation date
8/16/2018 11:10:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
8/21/2018
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
165
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A key consideration in the Planning Commission's deliberations was an assessment of <br /> how this project, and proposed conditions, compared to other similar past approvals. <br /> These comparisons, including information on religious institutions with <br /> preschools/daycares are summarized in Attachment 7, noting that, as CUP approvals, <br /> conditions were considered and applied on a case-by-case and site-specific basis, <br /> reflecting the particular characteristics of the project and its location. <br /> Relationship of this Approval to Prior Approvals <br /> The Millers' appeal states that the project would be contrary to the conditions of past <br /> approvals, including the original approval (UP-77-13) for the Masonic Lodge, and <br /> amendments to that approval adopted by the City Council, on appeal, in 2016. The <br /> original Use Permit for the Masonic Lodge (Lodge) recognized the proximity and <br /> potential sensitivity of neighboring residences to the north, and required the building and <br /> site to be designed to focus activities towards the southern portion of the property, and <br /> provide "an effective buffer" between the Lodge and adjacent residential uses. The <br /> approval did not include specific prohibitions on outdoor areas, or specify minimum <br /> dimensions or operational standards for a buffer area. Ultimately, the building was <br /> designed to not include windows or doors along its north side, although a set of French <br /> doors was later added. <br /> As previously noted, in 2016 the City Council considered and adopted amended <br /> conditions of approval for UP-77-13, initiated by the Masonic Lodge to address a series <br /> of code enforcement actions related to large events that had been held when the facility <br /> was being leased. Among other requirements, the amendments prohibited any outdoor <br /> events, activities, and outdoor music, required sharing of event calendars, mandated <br /> that doors have self-closing mechanisms, directed the north-facing French doors to be <br /> replaced with solid wood doors, and imposed limitations on operating hours and number <br /> of total occupants. <br /> In its review of the Chabad's application, staff and the Planning Commission were <br /> aware of and sensitive to the history of the project site, and to the heightened level of <br /> concern from neighbors. However, it was also recognized that this was a new <br /> application that needed to be considered objectively and on its own merits, and in <br /> relationship to comparable approvals and uses. An important factor in this decision is <br /> the Chabad's religious use, for which the Planning Commission concluded both that a <br /> limited amount of outdoor use was both necessary and appropriate, and that a <br /> daycare/preschool with an outdoor play area should be allowed, similar to those that <br /> have been allowed for numerous other religious institutions in Pleasanton and based on <br /> the site-specific characteristics. While the Chabad is a new application where all the <br /> conditions imposed on the Masonic Lodge are not applicable, the Planning Commission <br /> nonetheless imposed conditions that address similar issues about noise and <br /> compatibility, as conditions to ensure a use is not being injurious to properties in the <br /> vicinity is a required finding for the issuance of a CUP under the municipal code. <br /> Page 9 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.