04 - Laserfiche WebLink

3.City of Pleasanton Table 3-1. Recent and Ex•ected Future Develo•ment Trends Criterion Response Has your jurisdiction annexed any land since Yes the development of the previous hazard mitigation plan? • If yes,give the estimated area annexed and Since February 2012(date of City Council adoption of resolution of previous hazard estimated number of parcels or structures. mitigation plan),the City has processed 2 annexations(Balch and Linfoot-Mix- Marks),resulting in a total of 22 acres annexed to the City.This consists of 5 parcels. Is your jurisdiction expected to annex any Yes areas during the performance period of this plan? • If yes, please describe land areas and Yes,the City is expecting to annex areas on the outskirts of Pleasanton over the next dominant uses. 5 years.These areas are primarily in the Happy Valley and West of Foothill area,and are generally occupied by lower-density residential units. • If yes,who currently has permitting The County currently has permitting authority in these areas. authority over these areas? Are any areas targeted for development or Yes major redevelopment in the next five years? • If yes,please briefly describe,including Redevelopment activities are focused around transit stations,with few hazard risks whether any of the areas are in known other than geotechnical and dam inundation hazards. hazard risk areas How many permits for new construction were 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 issued in your jurisdiction since the Single Family 83 62 68 87 74 development of the previous hazard mitigation Multi-Family 5 3 8 33 23 plan? Other(commercial,mixed use,etc.) 5 5 6 12 12 Please provide the number of new- Development has occurred throughout the city during the performance period for this construction permits for each hazard area or plan.The city does not have the ability to track the specific number of building provide a qualitative description of where permits issued by hazard area.It is important to note,however,that all new development has occurred. development was consistent with General Plan policies and municipal code standards. Please describe the level of buildout in the The City of Pleasanton is substantially built out;however,several in-fill lots have not jurisdiction,based on your jurisdiction's been developed, both with potential residential and non-residential uses. buildable lands inventory. If no such inventory exists, provide a qualitative description. 3.4 CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT The City of Pleasanton has performed an inventory and analysis of existing capabilities, plans,programs and policies that enhance its ability to implement mitigation strategies. The introduction at the beginning of this volume of the hazard mitigation plan describes the components included in the capability assessment and their significance for hazard mitigation planning. This section summarizes the following findings of the assessment: • An assessment of legal and regulatory capabilities is presented in Table 3-2. • An assessment of fiscal capabilities is presented in Table 3-3. • Development and permitting capabilities are presented in Table 3-4. • An assessment of administrative and technical capabilities is presented in Table 3-5. • An assessment of education and outreach capabilities is presented in Table 3-6. • Information on National Flood Insurance Program(NFIP) compliance is presented in Table 3-7. • Classifications under various community mitigation programs are presented in Table 3-8. • The community's adaptive capacity for the impacts of climate change is presented in Table 3-9. TETRA TECH 3-3