My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
19
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2018
>
051518
>
19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2018 4:34:34 PM
Creation date
5/10/2018 11:19:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/15/2018
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Technical Next Steps <br /> The Study determined that potable reuse was technically feasible, but also brought to <br /> light a number of technical challenges and questions that need to be answered if <br /> potable reuse is to be further pursued. Therefore, as part of the Study, a conceptual <br /> outline of technical next steps was prepared and is included in the Executive Summary. <br /> These technical next steps can be split into two main categories; water supply options <br /> and further technical efforts that can occur concurrently if desired. <br /> The first category is a broader effort to place potable reuse in the context of other water <br /> supply options in terms of yield, cost, reliability, and other metrics. Recommended next <br /> steps are 1) conduct a regional water demand study to refine regional water demand <br /> projections and establish a target yield for the various water supply options and 2) <br /> support an update to Zone 7's 2016 Water Supply Evaluation to reflect the findings from <br /> this Study as well as new data from other water supply options that have developed <br /> since 2016. The regional consulting costs for these next steps are estimated to be just <br /> under $500,000 and have an implementation time frame of under a year. <br /> The second category of next steps involves further technical efforts to advance <br /> development of a potable reuse project. The short-term efforts (1 — 2 years) would focus <br /> on narrowing potable reuse alternatives based on determining the best end use option. <br /> The regional consulting costs for these next steps are estimated to be just under $1 <br /> million. <br /> For each option, costs would be shared/apportioned among Tri-Valley Water Agencies. <br /> If City Council is interested in further exploring a potable reuse project, the conceptual <br /> next steps and costs will be further defined in coordination with a Tri-Valley Water <br /> Liaison Committee meeting to be held in the summer. Recommended next steps, <br /> including cost sharing between the Tri-Valley Water Agencies, would be presented to <br /> City Council at a subsequent City Council Meeting. <br /> Community Survey on Potable Reuse <br /> In January 2018, a community survey on Tri-Valley water supply and reliability to <br /> determine level of understanding and support for potable reuse was conducted as a <br /> follow up to the November 2015 community survey. Since the previous survey was <br /> conducted during the drought and community attitudes may be changing, staff <br /> determined a new survey was warranted. <br /> The survey results found that over the last few years, voters have become more <br /> concerned about water quality and water rates. Of those that oppose using purified <br /> recycled water, cost increases and concerns over the safety of the water were the main <br /> reasons given. A very slight majority of respondents support supplementing existing <br /> water supplies with purified recycled water. Of those, the majority would support a $5 <br /> monthly increase in their water bills, or a 5% increase. <br /> Further details on the survey results will be presented at this City Council Meeting. <br /> Page 5 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.