My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2018
>
051518
>
11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/15/2018 5:42:37 PM
Creation date
5/10/2018 9:54:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/15/2018
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton Recycled Water Project <br />CEQA Addendum <br />An impact is considered less than significant if the analysis concludes that the impact would <br />cause no substantial adverse change to the environment and that accordingly it would not require <br />mitigation. <br />An impact is considered less than significant with mitigation incorporated if the analysis <br />concludes that, with the inclusion of mitigation measures to which the project proponent has <br />agreed, the impact would cause no substantial adverse change to the environment. <br />• An impact is considered potentially significant if the analysis concludes that the impact exceeds <br />applicable regulatory thresholds of significance and cannot be reduced to a Tess -than -significant <br />level with potentially feasible mitigation. <br />In assessing the impacts of the addition of a booster pump station to the project as originally approved, <br />the City is not assessing whether impacts are significant compared with existing physical conditions (i.e., <br />conditions without implementation of any part of the project). Rather, the City is assessing how the <br />incremental impacts, if any, associated with the addition of a booster pump station compare with the <br />impacts disclosed in the IS/MND. This approach is expressly sanctioned by the governing statutory and <br />regulatory provisions and case law. (See Public Resources Code, § 21166; CEQA Guidelines, § 15162; <br />Bowman v. City of Petaluma (1986) 185 Cal.App.3d 1065, 1078-1082; Temecula Band of Luiseno <br />Mission Indians v. Rancho Cal. Water Dist. (1996) 43 Cal.App.4th, 425, 438-439). <br />1.4 Organization of this Document <br />CEQA Guidelines do not specify the format of addendums. The content and format of this Addendum is <br />as follows. <br />• Chapter 1, "Introduction," identifies the purpose, terminology, and organization of the <br />Addendum. <br />• Chapter 2, "Description of Proposed Project Change," identifies the proposed project refinements <br />in detail. <br />• Chapter 3, "Environmental Analysis," presents the analysis for each component of the project <br />change. This chapter identifies the proposed project change's impacts in relevant resource <br />categories. <br />• Chapter 4, "Conclusion," summarizes the conclusions of the environmental review in this <br />Addendum. <br />April 2018 <br />1-4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.