Laserfiche WebLink
streamlined approval process in the City of Pleasanton (should the developer/applicant <br /> choose this process), their project must: <br /> • be a multi-family development and cannot involve development/redevelopment of <br /> a site that has contained housing occupied by tenants within 10 years; <br /> • be located in areas surrounded by development on 75 percent of its borders, and <br /> not be located in environmentally sensitive areas; <br /> • pay prevailing wages to construction workers; and <br /> • restrict at least 50 percent of its units to be affordable to households classified as <br /> having low income (e.g. less than 80 percent of the area median income). <br /> At this time, it is not clear whether the requirements listed above would serve as a <br /> disincentive to developers to pursue this streamlining process. However, staff believes <br /> that the requirement to make at least 50 percent of the total units affordable to <br /> households classified as having low income would make many projects financially <br /> infeasible. <br /> That said, a streamlined process for residential project review represents a significant <br /> change from past review processes in Pleasanton. Prior to this change to State law, all <br /> of the potential high-density housing sites were zoned Planned Unit Development <br /> (PUD) and are therefore subject to review by both the Planning Commission and the <br /> City Council. Currently, staff, the Planning Commission, and the City Council review the <br /> applications for conformance to the development standards and design guidelines <br /> adopted specifically for high density projects. If the projects meet these standards and <br /> guidelines, or approval of exceptions to these requirements has been granted, the <br /> projects are approved. <br /> Under the new streamlined process (which is largely at the developer's option based on <br /> meeting the criteria referenced above) these projects would not be subject to the <br /> California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and would require staff-level design <br /> review only. As such, they would be subject to "objective" development and design <br /> standards and could not be subject to referendum. Objective standards are typically <br /> those that can be measured, understood by all, and do not require interpretation or <br /> judgement. Staff would have 60 days to complete review for projects under 150 units <br /> and 90 days for projects containing 150 units or more. Projects would not be required to <br /> provide more than one parking space per unit and in some cases (e.g., if the project is <br /> within one half mile of public transit) no parking spaces may be required. <br /> This law is not applicable to single-family development or properties not currently zoned <br /> for residential development. After review of the various eligibility requirements, staff <br /> believes the only sites likely to be eligible for the streamlined processing in the short- <br /> term, would be the remaining five high density housing sites listed within the Housing <br /> Element site inventory. Those sites include: <br /> • East Dublin/Pleasanton BART parking lot site (Owens Drive); <br /> • Roche Site (vacant property at 4300 Hacienda Drive); <br /> Page 4 of 9 <br />