Laserfiche WebLink
BACKGROUND <br /> The Governor's approval of the 2017 housing package was a response to the ongoing <br /> and serious challenge of housing availability and affordability in the State. Findings of a <br /> recently published report titled, California's Housing Future: Opportunities and <br /> Challenges (Executive Summary included as Attachment 1), include: <br /> • Production averaged less than 80,000 new homes annually over the last <br /> 10 years, and ongoing production continues to fall far below the projected need <br /> of 180,000 additional homes annually. <br /> • Lack of supply and rising costs are compounding growing inequality and limiting <br /> advancement opportunities for younger Californians. Without intervention much <br /> of the housing growth is expected to overlap significantly with disadvantaged <br /> communities and areas with less job availability. <br /> • Continued sprawl will decrease affordability and quality of life while increasing <br /> transportation costs. <br /> • The majority of California's renters — more than 3 million households — pay <br /> more than 30 percent of their income toward rent, and nearly one-third — more <br /> than 1.5 million households — pay more than 50 percent of their income toward <br /> rent. <br /> • Overall homeownership rates are at their lowest since the 1940s. <br /> • California is home to 12 percent of the nation's population, but a disproportionate <br /> 22 percent of the nation's homeless population. <br /> • For California's vulnerable populations, discrimination and inadequate <br /> accommodations for people with disabilities are worsening housing cost and <br /> affordability challenges. <br /> The State has consistently recognized the important role that local governments play in <br /> the production of housing. The State has deployed a range of strategies over recent <br /> years in an effort to address housing needs: these include the Regional Housing Needs <br /> Allocation (RHNA), allocated to each local jurisdiction through the regional Council of <br /> Government (COG)1 as their "fair share" of the Statewide housing need; in legislation <br /> that requires local jurisdictions to accommodate housing through appropriate zoning <br /> and reducing barriers to the production of housing; in incentives such as density <br /> bonuses for affordable housing; and in streamlining provisions intended to remove <br /> regulatory constraints, particularly for housing in proximity to transit. The "housing <br /> package" builds upon and expands these existing measures. <br /> In the Bay Area,the Metropolitan Transportation Commission(MTC)and Association of Bay Area Governments <br /> (ABAG)serve as the regional COGs. <br /> Page 2 of 9 <br />