09A - Laserfiche WebLink

Vice Chair Nagler asked about the reconfiguration of the park space to allow pass- through. Mr. Phelbert described the visual opening between the two communities and the safety features of the design. Commissioner Ritter asked if the basketball court would have lights. Mr. Phelbert replied no, it would not be available after sunset. Vice Chair Nagler asked how many homes are adjacent to the sport court. Mr. Phelbert pointed out the two homes and their configuration with the wall around the sport court. Commissioner O'Connor questioned the bike storage for 16 bikes and if it is adequate if there will be upwards of 36 beds. Mr. Phelbert acknowledged there are systems that allow stacking of bikes but stated those are not as favorable for this user group due to the difficulty to operate. Vice Chair Nagler asked how they arrived at 16. Mr. Phelbert did not have an explanation. Commissioner O'Connor asked about the architecture articulation and if it is tending towards the look of a school more so than the look of a home. He requested the windows be redesigned to add relief. Mr. Phelbert commented on the intent behind the design for natural light and livelihood. Vice Chair Nagler commented on the quality and consistency of visuals provided. Commissioner O'Connor agreed the buildings on the inside of the corridor are more interesting than those on the outside. Mr. Phelbert rebutted, the visuals are all stills of the same 3D model. He clarified some sides reflect better than others in stills but assured the architecture is consistent on all sides of the building. Commissioner Allen agreed with Vice Chair Nagler and Commissioner O'Connor's comments. She expressed additional concern with the materials and ongoing maintenance. Mr. Phelbert explained the materials were selected based on durability and with consideration of weathering. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, October 25, 2017 Page 3 of 4