My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
09A
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2018
>
020618
>
09A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/31/2018 5:19:12 PM
Creation date
1/31/2018 3:10:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/6/2018
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PROJECT SITE ALTERNATIVES <br />The proposed use would comply with the allowed uses for the property and the buildings and <br />site improvements would be complimentary to the Irby Ranch development. Alternatives for the <br />site could include: <br />1. Proposing buildings with a different design, shape, size, and/or location; <br />2. Undertaking no project, under which the property would likely remain vacant. <br />The first alternative wouldn't necessarily result in significant design or operational benefits, <br />and/or an improved design. The second alternative would not be consistent with the City's <br />General Plan goals and policies as well as the City Council's priority work plan to support <br />Sunflower Hill and provide affordable housing to individuals with special needs. Therefore, staff <br />believes the proposed project represents an acceptable development scenario. <br />PROS/CONS <br />Pros <br />Con <br />Building design is architecturally compatible <br />with the Irby Ranch as well as other buildings <br />in Pleasanton, as conditioned. <br />The project may increase parking demand <br />and traffic in the vicinity of the project. <br />Consistent with the Irby Ranch Development <br />Agreement and allowed uses. <br />Provides affordable housing for individuals <br />with special needs meeting goals within the <br />City's General Plan <br />PUD CONSIDERATIONS <br />The Pleasanton Municipal Code sets forth the purposes of the PUD District and the <br />considerations to be addressed in reviewing a PUD Development Plan proposal. The Planning <br />Commission must make the following findings that the proposed PUD Development Plan <br />conforms to the purposes of the PUD District before making its recommendation. <br />1. Whether the proposed development plan is in the best interests of the public <br />health, safety, and general welfare: <br />The proposed project, as conditioned, meets all applicable City standards concerning <br />public health, safety, and welfare. The subject development would include the <br />installation of all required on-site utilities, with connections to municipal systems in order <br />to serve the new buildings. The project will not generate volumes of traffic that cannot <br />be accommodated by existing city streets and intersections in the area and the Level Of <br />Service (LOS) would not be substantially adversely affected. The development would be <br />designed to meet the requirements of the California Building Code, California Fire Code, <br />and other applicable City codes. The proposed development is compatible with the <br />adjacent uses and would be consistent with the existing scale and character of the area. <br />Therefore, staff believes the proposed PUD development plan is in the best interests of <br />the public health, safety, and general welfare, and that this finding can be made. <br />PUD -129, Sunflower Hill Planning Commission <br />13of16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.