PC-2009-40, PUD-70, SAN JOSE ARENA MANAGEMENT

regulations in regards to pesticide storage, use, transportation, reporting, and safety. The plan shall encourage minimization and efficiency of chemical and fertilizer use. Because the receiving water has been listed as impaired by diazinon, diazinon use shall be prohibited. The plan must be approved by the City Engineer prior to the beginning of occupancy. 17. Cooperative Agreement—Traffic Mitigation. Prior to the recordation of a final map for the Staples Ranch Site, the City of Pleasanton will confer with the City of Livermore, the City of Dublin and Alameda County on a strategy to fund and complete mitigation measures within each other's jurisdictions. More specifically, the City of Pleasanton shall seek to enter into one or more binding agreements with each of these other local agencies in order to facilitate a fair and equitable sub -regional approach to traffic mitigation, to the mutual benefit of all of the affected jurisdictions. Depending on the willingness of these other local agencies to enter into such agreements, the ultimate result may be a single multijurisdictional agreement or one or more agreements between Pleasanton and one or more of the other agencies. The strategy will address fair share mitigation for projects approved by one jurisdiction that contribute cumulatively considerable traffic to intersections and roadway segments in neighboring jurisdiction(s) with cumulatively substandard LOS. The applicable standard for LOS will be that established by each local agency for its current jurisdictional area and its sphere of influence. If spheres of influence overlap or jurisdiction over an intersection is split between two local agencies, the standard to be achieved by mitigation, where feasible, will be determined by mutual agreement of the jurisdictions involved. The City of Pleasanton is willing to ensure that projects it approves contribute fair share mitigation cost for improvements in other jurisdictions but only if the other jurisdictions are also willing to reciprocate for projects within their jurisdictions that contribute considerably to traffic occurring within the City of Pleasanton. The strategy also may allocate mitigation responsibility to each jurisdiction for improvements within its jurisdiction on the understanding that each jurisdiction will be addressing the cumulative contributions from projects in neighboring jurisdictions. If a mutually agreeable strategy cannot be reached with the City of Livermore, City of Dublin and Alameda County, or any one of them, then the City of Pleasanton will not require the contribution of mitigations for contributions to impacts in any other jurisdiction unwilling to agree to reciprocity within the City of Pleasanton. This is because, under such circumstances, the City could not be assured that projects it approves are being assessed for mitigation only in proportion to their impact and because the City may need to require reallocation of the mitigation contribution to intersections and roadway segments within 27