PC-2009-32, PRZ-48, CITY OF PLEASANTON

PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. PC -2009-32 RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON TO REZONE TWO SITES IN HACIENDA BUSINESS PARK, AS FILED UNDER CASE PRZ-48 WHEREAS, the City of Pleasanton has applied for the rezoning of three sites in Hacienda Business Park from the PUD-I/C-O (Planned Unit Development — Industrial-Commercial/Office) District to PUD -MU (Planned Unit Development — Mixed Use) District; and to change the Hacienda land use designation from Mixed Office, Research and Development/Light Manufacturing Planning District (MOIPD) to Mixed Commercial, Office, Research and Development/Light Manufacturing Residential District (MCOIRPD): (1) The W.P. Carey site (Hacienda Site 7G), at the southeast corner of Owens Drive and Willow Road (Assessor's Parcel No. 941-2778-013-00 and part of APN 941-2778-012-00), approximately 11 acres; (2) The BRE site (Hacienda Site 7E), at the north corner of Hacienda Drive and Gibraltar Drive (APN 941-2778-011-00), approximately 8.2 acres; and (3) The Roche Molecular Systems site (a portion of Hacienda Site 6), south of Gibraltar Drive between Willow Road and Hacienda Drive (a portion of APN 941-2761-003-00), about 12.4 acres (of the approximate 33.4 -acre Roche site); and WHEREAS, the rezoning of the above sites would potentially allow the future development of up to approximately 1,030 residential units following the preparation and adoption of a Major Modification to the Hacienda PUD rezoning; and WHEREAS, at its duly noticed public hearing of September 23, 2009, the Planning Commission received a proposed Negative Declaration for Case PRZ-48; and WHEREAS, the public was given the opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the potential impacts in accordance with the applicable State and local guidelines governing the preparation of Negative Declarations; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the rezoning would not have any significant adverse effects on the site's wildlife.