Laserfiche WebLink
EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />LAVWMA Proposed Energy Policy Resolution <br />Comments from the Pleasanton Energy Committe <br />November 25, 2003 <br /> <br />The Pleasanton Energy Committee (PEC) has rev <br />Energy Policy for the Livermore-Amador Valley War <br />considered at their December 17, 2003 meeting. <br />and recommendations to the LAVWMA board rega <br />hereby submits these comments to the Pleasanton C <br />policy at their December 2, 2003 meeting. <br /> <br />The transport of wastewater is a high cost energy <br />related impacts on the Tri-Valley community. As <br />responsibility to carry out its mission in a manner <br />its policies regarding energy use in terms of cost <br />safety and welfare. <br /> <br />As a public agency operating facilities in the con' <br />should be consistent with the policies and ordina~ <br />the energy facility being considered by LAVVVMA <br />facility needs to be planned, installed and operat{ <br />Pleasanton's Energy Plan and related ordinance~ <br />are the efficient and economical use of energy ar <br />energy decisions, the facilitation of renewable en <br /> <br />LAVVVMA should work in collaboration with the C <br />implementation of energy initiatives beneficial to <br />extension, to LAVWMA's ratepayers. An exampl <br />community aggregation of electricity purchases <br />a program. <br /> <br />The "cost" to power its operations described in <br />be based on life-cycle costs, including an evalu <br />public agency, LAVWMA should consider that <br />short term may have the unintended consequem <br />in the future. <br /> <br />wed the proposed resolution for an <br />9r Management Agency, which will be <br />~e PEC offers the following comments <br />ding the policy. In addition, the PEC <br />ty Council for their consideration of the <br /> <br />intensive process, with significant <br />a public agency, LAVWMA has the <br />lhat considers the broad implications of <br />~e environment, and public health, <br /> <br />unities it serves, LAVWMA policy <br />~ces of those communities. Because <br />,is within the City of Pleasanton, this <br />.d in a manner consistent with <br />,. Fundamental to the goals of the Plan <br />~ distributed resources, local control of <br />.rgy, and principles of sustainability. <br /> <br />ity and the region toward the <br />he community as a whole, and by <br />~ of such an initiative could be <br />;hould the City move forward with such <br /> <br />,e proposed LAVWMA Resolution must <br />ion of fuel price risk. Further, as a <br />cisions it makes to reduce "costs" in the <br />',e of far higher costs to the community <br /> <br />should be based on a diversity of <br /> <br />5. "Reliability" as described in the LAVWMA policy <br /> technologies, fuels and strategies. <br /> <br /> <br />