Laserfiche WebLink
3. Conduct a public bidding process to secure the services of an entity (or entities) to <br /> process organic and recyclable material collected by PGS in the City of Pleasanton. <br /> 4. Authorize the Subcommittee to continue working with staff on a new collection rate <br /> schedule. <br /> FINANCIAL STATEMENT <br /> The costs for services from HF&H will be covered by the City's Measure D funds. <br /> BACKGROUND <br /> PGS has an exclusive Franchise with the City to collect, transport and dispose of refuse <br /> and collect and process recyclable material and organics produced and accumulated <br /> within the corporate limits of the City. When PGS first began servicing the City in the <br /> 1970's, (the current Franchise was awarded in 1989 but PGS serviced the City prior to <br /> the current agreement) the refuse operation consisted of dumping garbage from cans <br /> into a truck and transporting the material to a landfill. Since that time and in response to <br /> State regulations, the complexity of the operation has increased significantly involving <br /> the collection of multiple sized carts at the curbside with refuse, recyclable and organic <br /> material separated by customers, operating a material recovery facility to segregate <br /> recyclable materials, delivering and selling material to recyclers, arranging for the <br /> processing of organic material, arranging for the disposal of refuse at the landfill and <br /> complying with a broad range of state and regional requirements and administrative <br /> reporting. Staffs involvement has also increased significantly as it works to comply with <br /> state and regional reporting, service and outreach requirements. Customer expectations <br /> have also increased considerably specifically by demanding a range and quality of <br /> services in line with current collection rates and with various service options that meet <br /> individual needs. During the course of these changes, PGS has demonstrated its ability <br /> to meet community and City expectations. <br /> Based on PGS' history of meeting community expectations, the City Council <br /> Subcommittee and the City Council determined it appropriate to engage in negotiations <br /> with PGS prior to conducting a public bidding process for a new franchisee. The intent <br /> of this processhas been to determine if PGS could meet the City's current and future <br /> needs in a manner that is consistent with industry standards, with services and rates <br /> comparable to neighboring cities, with an increase in the franchise fee, and with PGS <br /> (rather than the ratepayers) assuming reasonable risks related to the cost of its <br /> operations. To assist with this determination and process, the City Council approved an <br /> agreement with HF&H Consultants, LLC, based on its significant local, state and <br /> national expertise and knowledge in refuse franchise development and administration. <br /> The Council concluded that if PGS could meet City goals, the City could eliminate the <br /> considerable cost of conducting a public franchise process and the potential customer <br /> issues related to transitioning to a new service provider. Staff entered this process with <br /> the following basic goals: <br /> City Goals for a New Collection Agreement <br /> • Obtain a state of the art service agreement consistent with best industry practices; <br /> • Obtain collection rate relief; <br /> • Transfer risk regarding any unexpected operating costs from the ratepayers to PGS; <br /> • Increase services to the community consistent with industry standards and adjacent <br /> communities; <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />