My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
03
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
121917
>
03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2017 2:12:47 PM
Creation date
12/13/2017 10:56:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/19/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
93103418 <br /> protest pursuant to this Section 3.2 (b) shall not be construed as <br /> an action of noncompliance under the terms of this Agreement. <br /> (d) Specific Project-Generated Traffic Improvements. <br /> Stoneridge Mall Road is designed to function as a traffic <br /> distributor and best fulfills its function without traffic <br /> signals. The parties agree, however, that if a multi-level <br /> parking structure is constructed and, in the determination of <br /> traffic engineers for the City (following review by and <br /> consultation with the Developer's traffic engineers) , traffic <br /> control measures are necessary on Stoneridge Mall Road, Developer <br /> shall pay for the installation of a traffic signal or other <br /> similar mitigation measure. Such mitigation measure shall become <br /> a condition imposed during the design review process, but such <br /> condition will allow actual field studies for specified period of <br /> time prior to the actual installation of such traffic mitigation <br /> measure. <br /> (e) public Tran4t. The Developer will continue to <br /> cooperate in permitting public bus access to and from the <br /> Shopping Center as provided in the existing written agreements <br /> with Contra Costa County Transit Authority, Livermore Amador <br /> Valley Transit Authority, and San Francisco-Bay Area Rapid <br /> Transit District. <br /> 3.3 Proiect Phasing. The Project will be developed in <br /> phases, and the Parties acknowledge that Developer cannot <br /> presently predict the timing or sequencing of any such Project <br /> phasing. Such decisions depend upon numerous factors which are <br /> not within the control of Developer, such as market orientation <br /> and demand, interest rates, competition and other similar <br /> factors. Because the California Supreme Court held in Pardee <br /> Construction Co. v, City of Camarillo, 37 Cal. 3d 465 (1984) , <br /> that failure of the parties therein to provide for the timing of <br /> development resulted in a later-adopted initiative restricting <br /> the timing of development approved under the parties' agreement, <br /> it is the Parties' intent to cure that deficiency by <br /> acknowledging and providing that Developer shall have the right <br /> to develop the Project in phases in such order and at such times <br /> as Developer deems appropriate within the exercise of its <br /> subjective business judgment and the provisions of this <br /> Agreement. By entering into this Agreement, Developer shall not <br /> be obligated to develop the Project. <br /> 3.4 Other. Governmental Permits. <br /> (a) Developer or City (whichever is appropriate) <br /> shall apply for such other permits and approvals from other <br /> governmental or quasi-governmental agencies which may have <br /> jurisdiction over the Project (such as any public utility <br /> district) as may be required for the development of, or provision <br /> of services to, the Project. City shall promptly and diligently <br /> cooperate, at no cost to the City, with Developer in its <br /> endeavors to obtain such permits and approvals and, from time to <br /> time at the request of Developer, shall attempt with due <br /> -8- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.