My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-99-67
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
PC-99-67
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2006 9:32:55 AM
Creation date
12/19/2003 4:54:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/22/1999
DOCUMENT NO
PC-99-67
DOCUMENT NAME
PUD-99-05
NOTES
SUMMERHILL HOMES
NOTES 3
SUBD 31 LOTS W/2 EXISTING HOMES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. PC-99-67 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION <br />FOR THE APPLICATION OF SUMMERHILL HOMES, AS FILED UNDER CASE <br />PUD-99-05 <br /> <br />WHEREAS, SummerHill Homes has applied for PUD development plan approval to allow the <br />subdivision ofa 15.2:!: acre site (2 existing parcels) into 31 lots ranging in size from <br />approximately 11,387 square feet to 7,787 square feet, with an approximately 1.8- <br />acre remainder site with two existing homes located at 1015, 1027, and 1500 Rose <br />Avenue; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, zoning for the property is PUD-MDR - (Planned Unit Development-Medium <br />Density Residential) District; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, at its meeting of September 22, 1999, the Planning Commission received a proposed <br />negative declaration prepared for Case PUD-99-05; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has received and reviewed the Initial Study dated <br />September 3, 1999, and received the recommendations of staff; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held at which time the public was given the <br />opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the potential impacts in accordance with the <br />applicable state and local guidelines governing the preparation of Negative <br />Declarations and Environmental Impact Reports; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that approval of the proposed project would not <br />have any significant adverse effects on the environment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.