My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
120517
>
14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2017 12:13:27 PM
Creation date
11/29/2017 11:40:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/5/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF MEASURE PP Rebuttal Arguments in Support or Opposition <br /> Yes on PP (Protect Pleasanton): of the proposed laws are the opinions of the authors. <br /> • Immediately protects our scenic ridgelines, vital REBUTTAL TO ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF <br /> wildlife habitats and oak forests. MEASURE PP <br /> • Closes loopholes in our existing voter-approved hous- Vote NO on Measure PP <br /> ing cap. Measure PP promises ridgeline protection but cannot <br /> • Placed on the ballot by over 5,0(X)citizens. deliver. <br /> No on QQ: • It encourages development of large ultra private <br /> • Is a "plan to create a plan" that may NEVER protect estates due to the exemption for ten homes or less. <br /> ridgelines. • It prevents private property owners from dedicating <br /> • Continues the loophole that gives our City Council the land for parks and trails. <br /> flexibility to count or not count units toward the voter- • It does not immediately protect the ridgelines <br /> approved Housing Cap. because they are private property. <br /> • Placed on the ballot at the request of ridgeline develop- • It has no provision for environmental review. <br /> ers and written with a provision to kill Measure PP The signatures collected reflect the desire of residents of <br /> even if it passes with a majority of votes. Pleasanton for hillside protection. The current Council <br /> This is black and white: shares this vision and included hillside protection as a pri- <br /> • Measure PP Protects Pleasanton ridgelines NOW. ority for this term. The Council is committed to acquiring <br /> • Measure QQ does not! publicly accessible open space to continue our regional <br /> Over 5000 concerned Pleasanton residents signed a peti- trail network. <br /> tion to put this initiative on the ballot because they are Measure PP claims to protect Pleasanton ridgelines but <br /> concerned with future development that would destroy actually jeopardizes the protection by allowing the <br /> Pleasanton's scenic ridges forever: exemption for ten homes or less. It forces us into long, <br /> Our City Council majority recently approved two hilltop complex and costly legal battles. <br /> developments. They approved massive grading of hill- The accusations made by the authors of Measure PP are <br /> sides, a mile long road spanning the top of many of our untrue. This is a matter of public record. <br /> Southeast Hills, and removal of extensive wildlife and Every Pleasanton resident values the beauty of our city. <br /> plant habitat including hundreds and hundreds of oak The Council is obligated to protect the taxpayers of this <br /> trees. More than 40 feet will be cut from the tops of our community from costly litigation.The Council is commit- <br /> beautiful hills to make pads for mega-mansions. THIS ted to an open public process that includes the entire com- <br /> MUST BE STOPPED! munity, even the authors of Measure PP. We want to <br /> Developers are preparing to submit plans for even more ensure that the few remaining opportunities to acquire <br /> environmental destruction of our ridgelands. This is our publicly accessible open space and ridgeline protection <br /> last chance to Protect Pleasanton's ridgelines. is achieved. <br /> Vote Yes on PP (Protect Pleasanton) and continue to Measure QQ was placed on the ballot to protect the city <br /> enjoy our quaint city while preserving the majestic nature from costly litigation and to help clarify the issues. We <br /> of our surrounding landscape and ridgelines. trust the voters will agree. <br /> This is black and white: Vote Yes on PP (Protect There is better way.Vote No on Measure PP <br /> Pleasanton)and No on QQ. s/Cheryl Cook-Kallio <br /> For more information: Pleasanton City Council Member <br /> www.SavePleasantonsHills.com s/Mary Jane Casper <br /> s/Kay Ayala Vice Chair Human Services Commission <br /> City Council Member(1996-2004) s/James A.Dibiase <br /> s/Steve Brozosky Vice-Chair. Park & Recreation Commission <br /> City Council Member(2002-2006), siBonnie Shamblin <br /> Pleasanton School Board Trustee Downtown Business Owner <br /> s/Karla Brown-Belcher 4th Generation Pleasanton Native <br /> Co-author Measure PP s/Jocelyn S.Combs <br /> s/Anne Fox Former East Bay Regional Park District Director <br /> Planning Commissioner <br /> s/Cindy McGovern <br /> Pleasanton City Council Member <br /> PLPP-2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.