Laserfiche WebLink
by Measure PP. Areas protected by Measure PP would be off limits to development of <br /> more than 10 residential units per legal lot. <br /> Figure 5: 'Last Hill" Method vs. Proposed Ridgeline Definition Approach <br /> Ridgeline per currently proposed <br /> method <br /> II <br /> Ridgeline per the last <br /> hill"method <br /> The mapping contained in this report is intended to provide City decisions-makers and the public <br /> with a birds-eye view of Measure PP-related development constraints in the Southeast Hills. <br /> When individual projects are proposed in the area, project applicants would be expected to <br /> conduct Measure PP mapping of their specific development sites, allowing for more fine-tuned <br /> development proposals reflecting the actual topography of project sites at the time of any <br /> proposed development. This mapping of individual project sites will be required to use the <br /> methodology identified in this report, and be generally consistent with the mapping provided in <br /> this report, but could show a finer-grained pattern of areas subject to Measure PP (and areas <br /> not subject to Measure PP). The ultimate objective of each project-specific mapping would be to <br /> follow the restrictions of Measure PP while allowing for development of those areas not subject <br /> to Measure PP, General Plan, or other environmental considerations. In addition, definition and <br /> consideration of other concepts related to Measure PP (e.g., the definition of "structure" and <br /> whether artificial slopes should be excluded from Measure PP restrictions) would be undertaken <br /> at a project-specific level, per Council direction. <br /> Individual development projects (whether comprising 10 or fewer units on a legal lot and not <br /> subject to Measure PP, or more than 10 units on a legal lot and subject to Measure PP) would <br /> be subject to environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act <br /> Mapping of Southeast Hills Planning Commission <br /> Page 9 of 10 <br />