My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-99-41
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
PC-99-41
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2006 9:32:53 AM
Creation date
12/19/2003 10:21:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/23/1999
DOCUMENT NO
PC-99-41
DOCUMENT NAME
PUD-98-16
NOTES
CITY OF PLEASANTON
NOTES 3
MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE,CLUB HOUSE,FACILITIES 34 HOMESITES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. PC-99-41 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF <br />PLEASANTON FOR PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL AS FILED UNDER CASE <br />PUD-98-l6 <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City of Pleasanton has applied for PUD development plan approval for a <br />municipal golf course, club house and related facilities, and a maximum of 34 <br />additional home sites plus three existing residences on 345.8:t acres of land <br />generally located southeast of the Happy Valley/Alisal Road intersection; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, prezoning for the property as specified by the Happy Valley Specific Plan is PUD <br />(Planned Unit Development) - GC (Golf Course )/LDR (Low Density Residential) <br />NOS (Agricultural/Open Space) District; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the golf courselhousing project will not create any impacts not previously <br />addressed in the Environmental Impact Report prepared and certified for the <br />Happy Valley Specific Plan; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, at its duly noticed public hearing of June 23, 1999, the Planning Commission <br />considered all public testimony, relevant exhibits, and recommendations ofthe <br />City staff concerning this application; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission made the following findings: <br /> <br />1. The plan is in the best interests of the public health, safety, and <br />general welfare. <br /> <br />The proposed project, as conditioned, meets all applicable City standards <br />concerning public health, safety, and welfare, e.g. vehicle access, geologic <br />hazards (not within a special studies zone), and flood hazards. The proposed <br />development is designed to be compatible with the adjacent land uses, as well as <br />the General Plan and Happy Valley Specific Plan designations for this site and all <br />other relevant policies and programs. The project has been planned to allow <br />future development to connect to the proposed infrastructure consistent with the <br />infrastructure design parameters contained within the Happy Valley Specific Plan. <br />Detailed geologic studies have been done in conjunction with the Happy Valley <br />Specific Plan and the PUD development plan. Mitigation measures have been <br />incorporated into the project design to mitigate any landslide or seismic safety <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.