My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-98-71
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
PC-98-71
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2006 9:33:03 AM
Creation date
12/17/2003 2:56:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/9/1998
DOCUMENT NO
PC-98-71
DOCUMENT NAME
AP-98-07(V-98-07/Z-98-162)
NOTES
ROD & BARBARA KERR
NOTES 3
MODIFY W/IN SETBACK
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. PC-98-7l <br /> <br />RESOLUTION DENYING THE APPEAL AND THEREBY UPHOLDING THE <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S APPROVAL OF THE APPLICATION OF ROD AND <br />BARBARA KERR, AS FILED UNDER CASE AP-98-07 (V-98-07/Z-98-162) <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Zoning Administrator conditionally approved Case V -98-07 /Z-98-162, the <br />application of Rod and Barbara Kerr for a variance from the Municipal Code <br />requiring that a one-story addition to an existing single-family residence maintain <br />a five-foot setback (rather than the applicant's requested three-foot setback) from <br />the northeastern side property line located at 5664 Paseo Navarro; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, within the time specified by the Pleasanton Municipal Code, the applicant filed an <br />appeal requesting that the variance be approved as originally submitted; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, zoning for the property is R-I-6,500 (Single-Family Residential) District; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, at its duly noticed public hearing of September 9, 1998, the Planning Commission <br />considered all public testimony, relevant exhibits, and recommendations of the <br />City staff; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, projects of this nature are categorically exempt from the requirements of the <br />California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); therefore no environmental <br />document was prepared for this project; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determined that approval of the three-foot side yard <br />setback is out of character with the neighborhood, would result in a grant of <br />special privilege, and would result in a substandard condition which would set an <br />undesirable precedent in the community; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determined that the variance findings as made by the <br />Zoning Administrator can be made and the approval of the Zoning Administrator <br />for a five-foot setback was a reasonable solution which enables the applicants to <br />maximize the use oftheir property. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.