Laserfiche WebLink
Mitigation Measure 4.D-2: I-680 Northbound and Southbound Ramp Merge/Diverge <br /> Areas at Stoneridge Drive. Construct improvements, such as the second phase of I- <br /> 680/1-580 interchange improvements,widening of State Route 84, and other planned <br /> roadway system modifications that would relieve freeway congestion in the study area <br /> where feasible. <br /> Site(s) affected: All sites within the proposed Zone (Phase I and Full Buildout). <br /> (Draft SEIR,pp. 4.D-52 to 4.D-53.) <br /> • Impact 4.D-7 <br /> Development facilitated by the proposed Zone would affect levels of service for <br /> freeway ramps at merge/diverge areas within 1-680 under Far-term(Cumulative) plus Project <br /> conditions. <br /> The SEIR evaluates the impact of the proposed Zone related to levels of service for <br /> freeway ramps at merge/diverge areas within 1-680. <br /> Significance Before Mitigation: Significant <br /> Significance After Mitigation: Significant and Unavoidable <br /> Finding: Changes have been incorporated into the proposed Zone that would <br /> substantially lessen this impact, however, the changes would not reduce this impact <br /> to a less-than-significant level. Mitigation Measure 4.D-2 is incorporated into the <br /> proposed Zone. <br /> Facts in Support of Finding: The following facts and mitigation measure indicate <br /> that the impact will not be reduced to less than significant. <br /> 1. The addition of traffic that would be generated by the Zone under Phase I and <br /> full buildout would further degrade operations of already deficient freeway <br /> segments and would either result in or worsen LOS F conditions at the I-680 <br /> northbound and southbound ramp merge/diverge areas at Stoneridge Drive. <br /> 2. Implementation of Mitigation Measure 4.D-2 set forth in Table 6-1 of the Final <br /> SEIR and listed in the MMRP will reduce the severity of Impact 4.D-7; as <br /> discussed in the SEIR, even with implementation of this mitigation measure, <br /> this impact would not be reduced to a less-than-significant level because the <br /> improvement described in Mitigation Measure 4.D-2 is within Caltrans right- <br /> of-way and requires substantial Caltrans design review and oversight, and is not <br /> under the control of the City. Therefore,because the timing of Mitigation <br /> Measure 4.D-2 is not certain at this time,the measure is not legally feasible, <br /> though the measure is physically feasible. This mitigation measure is hereby <br /> incorporated by reference and described above under Impact 4.D-5. <br /> Site(s) affected: All sites within the proposed Zone (Phase I and Full Buildout). <br /> 52 <br />