Laserfiche WebLink
<br />EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERA nONS <br /> <br />Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") Guideline Section 15093, <br />the City Council of the City of Pleasant on adopts and makes the following Statement of <br />Overriding Considerations regarding unavoidable environmental impacts of the Happy Valley <br />Specific Plan project ("Project") and the anticipated social, economic and other benefits of the <br />Project. <br /> <br />The City Council finds and determines, based on the evidence set forth in the Draft EIR <br />and Final EIR Chapters 3 and 5, as well as the evidence set forth below, that to the extent that any <br />significant environmental impacts (e.g. conversion of agricultural land to urban uses; and exposure <br />of structures and persons to injuries and death from seismic events) attributable to the Project <br />remain umnitigated, the benefits of the Specific Plan Project outweigh such unavoidable adverse <br />environmental effects relating to the conversion of agricultural land to urban use, and the <br />exposure of structures and populations to risk of injury and death from seismic activity. <br /> <br />In addition, the City Council finds and determines that the measures suggested by the <br />Draft EIR to reduce the cumulative regional impacts (e.g. conversion of agricultural land to urban <br />uses; traffic volumes on 1-580 and 1-680 which exceed adopted standards; need to expand <br />available water supply resources; need to expand wastewater treatment capacity; need to expand <br />wastewater export capacity; and exposure of portions of the fire service area to response times <br />exceeding 5 minutes) cannot be implemented in the absence of regional solutions, or are the <br />responsibility of one or more other public entities. <br /> <br />The City Council also finds and determines that the Project Alternatives ("Alternatives"), <br />as set forth in Chapter 4 of the Draft EIR, are unfeasible and/or less desirable than the Project <br />itself. Such Alternatives would create undesirable impacts (e.g. noise and traffic) on existing <br />residential development, as well as additional significant environmental impacts. The City Council <br />finds that the Alternatives would preclude obtaining specific social, economic and other benefits <br />of the Project. Specifically, the City Council finds and determines that the following social, <br />economic and other considerations warrant approval of the Project, notwithstanding any <br />unavoidable or unmitigated project level, or regional cumulative impacts, resulting from the <br />Project: <br /> <br />A. Recreation and Communitv Activitv. The City Council finds and determines that <br />the Project provides for well-planned recreational amenities, such as the municipal golf course, <br />local and regional trails, and open space which meet the needs of the City and the region, while <br />maintaining environmental quality. The Project provides social benefits to those residing in the <br />City and those choosing to reside in the City in the future by providing areas for outdoor <br />recreation available to all members of the public. In the General Plan, the City Council adopted <br />policies to enhance recreational opportunities and promote the development of a municipal golf <br />course. (See 1996 General Plan, Public Facilities Chapter, Policies 13 and 14.). In addition, open <br /> <br />Exhibit B <br /> <br />1 <br />