My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
110717
>
14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2017 11:39:33 AM
Creation date
11/1/2017 11:12:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/7/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
249
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7. Geology and Soils <br />Impact 4.E -4a: The proposed Zone would not result in any direct or cumulatively <br />considerable significant adverse impacts to geological resources exposing people or structures to <br />potential substantial adverse effects within the proposed Zone, including the risk of loss, injury, or <br />death involving: <br />i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, <br />ii) Strong seismic ground shaking, <br />iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction, or <br />iv) Landslides. <br />Impact 4.E -4b: The proposed Zone would not result in substantial soil erosion or the <br />loss of topsoil such that a significant adverse impact would occur. <br />Impact 4.E -4c: The proposed Zone would not be located on a geologic unit or soil <br />that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the proposed Zone such that a <br />significant adverse impact would occur. <br />Impact 4.E -4d: The proposed Zone would not be located on expansive soil such that a <br />significant adverse impact would occur. <br />(Draft SEIR, pp. 4.E-20 to 4.E-21) <br />In addition, development facilitated by the proposed Zone would not result in the loss <br />of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of <br />the state; and would not result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource <br />recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan; therefore, the <br />proposed Zone would have no impact on mineral resources. <br />(Draft SEIR, p. 6-7) <br />8. Greenhouse Gas Emissions <br />Impacts 4.E -3a: The proposed Zone would not generate greenhouse gas emissions, <br />either directly or indirectly, that would have a significant impact on the environment. <br />Impacts 4.E -3b: The proposed Zone would not conflict with an applicable plan, <br />policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. <br />(Draft SEIR, pp. 4.E-24 to 4.E-26) <br />9. Hazards and Hazardous Materials <br />Impact 4.E -5a: The proposed Zone would not create a significant hazard to the <br />public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. <br />Impact 4.E -5e: The proposed Zone would not impair implementation of or <br />physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. <br />Impact 4.E -5f: The proposed Zone would not expose people or structures to a <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.