14 - Laserfiche WebLink

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL Provided to the Planning Commission Atter Distribution of Packet Date Distributed: 0111 I"1 —41 From: Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 2:53 PM To: Steve Otto; Jenny Soo; Kendall Granucci Subject: Johnson Drive comment... Dear Planning Commission and Staff, Thank You for allowing comment... Perhaps, this may only be comment, and would never pass the test...but I must believe alternative information for a sustainable future is worthwhile. A little background...when I was 11-12 years old, I watched 1-680 being constructed almost everyday. My entry point was just West of the new/semi-new Safeway. The highway was being poured at least a foot thick, more if my memory is good. A few of my friends were the kids who opened the celebration... racing from Bernal Ave...South, to almost Sunol Blvd. We were the first traffic, causing "minor" congestion...when there were no cars. Fast forward to October 11, 2017 and 135,000 + cars and trucks daily. Road maintenance sucks on 1-680. You understand why I am writing...I know. 21st century technology is required for Johnson Drive(JDEDZ) and Pleasanton's future sustainability. So...for the lack of a better word, I will, perhaps, share my own thoughts, Transitional Congestion. Johnson Drive is a pilot/experiment/trial...to support quality of life services, not just someone's retirement. Sustainability,flexibility and any other form you could recommend would be a worthwhile support mechanism. I know your minds,creativeness and professional senses are up to the task. Although, I could go on forever...with many points to ensure a Transitional Congestion support mechanism. The #1 area that continues to devour my thoughts, is, In -Ground Parking Space Sensing Technology with application to support residents,business,regional and traveling pass -by. Although, this is one of many areas of concern! have...along with safety of all our citizens of Pleasanton...this would be a start. People require choice...!!! The details are actually easy. The environmental component being reviewed tonight, IMO, without the ability to immediately impact this project, if necessary, to create flexibility, existing infrastructure mitigation measures are not current and lack depth...creating a self interest style of development. Anyhow, "Thank You" for your time. Respectfully, Pete Miller P14-0852 and PUD -105, JDEDZ - Public Comments Provided for October 11, 2017 Planning Commission Meeting 63