My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
110717
>
14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2017 11:39:33 AM
Creation date
11/1/2017 11:12:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/7/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
249
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JDEDZ PROJECT REVIEW <br />SEPTEMBER 2017 <br />Civic Economics Analysis <br />Our key findings are as follows: <br />I: Costco Sales Forecasts <br />Both city consultants, Century Urban (conducted in 2015) and ALH (2016), overestimate <br />likely Costco sales based on a mix of outdated data and optimistic forecasting. <br />II: Sales Tax Revenue Sharing Repayment <br />As a result, the city's anticipated ability to make Sales Tax Sharing payments is in doubt, <br />and its expectation of surplus sales tax revenues is inflated. <br />III: Other Funding Sources for JDEDZ <br />Of the other public funding sources for JDEDZ development, as much as $10.1 million in <br />TIF funding is diverted from other pressing city transportation needs. <br />IV: Impact on Pleasanton Retail Market <br />ALH understates the impact of the JDEDZ on the Pleasanton retail market by (a) <br />overestimating the size and growth of that retail market and (b) ignoring ongoing trends <br />in the retail industry. <br />In sum, the current JDEDZ proposal asks the City of Pleasanton to invest substantial public <br />funds in a costly, long-term, speculative venture in a rapidly changing industry, and to do so <br />based on erroneously optimistic forecasts of costs and benefits. City Council and the citizens of <br />Pleasanton must demand better information before making such a momentous investment and <br />developing this key tract of land. <br />Civic Economics 2 <br />P14-0852 and PUD -105, JDEDZ - Public Comments Provided for October 11, 2017 Planning Commission Meeting 40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.