Laserfiche WebLink
precede project trenching in an attempt to locate additional archaeological sites <br /> and/or the original meander of the Mocho, where such sites would most likely be. <br /> If additional sites were to be found, the project developer shall adhere to the above <br /> mitigation measures. <br /> If human remains are discovered, the project developer shall contact the County <br /> Coroner immediately. If the coroner determines that the human remains are Native <br /> American remains, the project developer shall notify the California State Native <br /> American Heritage Commission. <br /> The archaeological consultant shall prepare a Final Archaeological Resources <br /> Report, meeting City and state standards, evaluating the historical importance of <br /> the archaeological resource and describing the archaeological and historical <br /> research methods employed in the testing, monitoring, and data recovery <br /> programs. The Director of Community Development shall review and approve this <br /> document. The project developer shall file the report with appropriate state offices. <br /> 28. In accordance with measure UT-1, plans submitted to the Building and Safety <br /> Division for plan check shall incorporate low-flow irrigation head and/or drip <br /> irrigation with electric controllers set to water after 7:00 p.m. and before 10:00 a.m., <br /> and property soil preparation for landscaped areas that includes a minimum of two <br /> inches of mulch and two inches of organic soil amendment, as recommended by <br /> a qualified landscape architect. <br /> 29. If it is determined through field inspections and/or monitoring that a site is not in <br /> compliance with an EIR mitigation/improvement measure, the responsible party for <br /> implementation of the mitigation/improvement measure is the responsible party to <br /> bring the mitigation/improvement measure into compliance. The responsible party <br /> is listed in the EIR Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan. The City of <br /> Pleasanton may require the responsible party to prepare a peer review report by <br /> a consultant chosen by the City of Pleasanton to determine compliance and to <br /> recommend measures to correct noncompliance. All peer review costs shall be <br /> borne by the party responsible for the implementation of the <br /> mitigation/improvement measure. <br /> As parcels are sold, new property owner(s) will be responsible for all of their <br /> parcel's "Project Developer" mitigation responsibilities as listed in the EIR <br /> Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan, including but not limited to: implementing <br /> mitigations, monitoring, reporting, bringing mitigation/improvement measures in <br /> nonconformance into conformance, and reimbursing the City of Pleasanton for <br /> costs borne by the City of Pleasanton to review monitoring reports and conduct <br /> other monitoring activities related to their parcel(s). <br /> Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a Mitigation Monitoring fund (or other <br /> funding mechanism acceptable to the City of Pleasanton) shall be established by <br /> the City of Pleasanton. The applicable Project Developer shall deposit funding into <br /> the Mitigation Monitoring fund (or other funding mechanism acceptable to the City <br /> of Pleasanton) to cover estimated City of Pleasanton costs to review future <br /> monitoring reports, contract with peer review consultants, conduct field <br />