My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
100317
>
11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2017 4:35:21 PM
Creation date
9/27/2017 3:37:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/3/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a <br /> o 1, <br /> _ .., <br /> Figure 13 <br /> (3585 Yellowstone Court) <br /> . 411111F .. <br /> ' A g will er <br /> �j ! i <br /> - T <br /> Figure 14 <br /> (3588 Yellowstone Court and 3598 Yellowstone Court respectively) <br /> Additionally, given that the appellants have a history of non-sanctioned living spaces(current attic space is <br /> under red-tag for the appellants allowing residents to reside in the attic), it is reasonable to assume this"mystery <br /> space", named"ATTIC BELOW"on the appellants drawings (Figure 8),will end up being an additional non- <br /> permitted room(making this a 9-bedroom"single family"home), which lends to an issue that will be addressed <br /> under"HEALTH AND SAFETY CONCERNS"below. <br /> Finally, we appreciate the Commission's address of the appellants' lack of landscaping in regards to aesthetics. <br /> The fact that this issue needed to be addressed as a condition of permit approval speaks to why vegetative <br /> screening is not a feasible option to satisfy our privacy concerns regarding north facing windows. Currently, <br /> and for the last 10 years, both the back and the front yard of the Robles' property are clay dirt with little or no <br /> vegetation. There is no way the City of Pleasanton can"police"the upkeep of a vegetative screening, putting us <br /> at a disadvantage and leaving our privacy and right to property enjoyment unprotected. <br /> HEALTH AND SAFETY CONCERNS <br /> Although concerns about health and safety were already well addressed in the Staff Report,we'd like to <br /> emphasize the fact that although the PMC does not limit the number of bedrooms within a single-family <br /> residence, we strongly feel, given the history of this residence, and by the owner's own admission of allowing a <br /> multitude of"temporary"residents,this project IS in fact a zoning issue. Despite the fact that the City of <br /> 11 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.