My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
100317
>
11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2017 4:35:21 PM
Creation date
9/27/2017 3:37:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/3/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> . • / • <br /> _�-... . <br /> • <br /> - .11 -3 ; = <br /> 21. <br /> 4"71;#40A1 - - <br /> • <br /> ` r•"�s r <br /> Figure 4 <br /> (View from Johnson upstairs bathroom window with approximate location of appellants'requested north facing <br /> windows outlined in yellow. Their window site-line will look directly into our shower if window is open.) <br /> We would like to urge you to review the recorded transcript of the initial hearing on May 25, 2017. Mr. Robles <br /> clearly stated during this hearing that he cannot control who resides in his own home, citing multiple friends of <br /> a current renter who come in and out of the house,and further stating that various individuals who have been <br /> arrested in the home were staying at the residence as guests of their youngest son. There is also no guarantee <br /> that their youngest son,of whom is the father of some of the grandchildren the appellants are raising, will not be <br /> back to reside and bring additional `temporary"residents into the home. The owners (appellants) take no <br /> responsibility for who enters or resides in their home, further escalating our privacy concerns(see HEALTH <br /> AND SAFETY CONCERNS below). Given these reasons, and all of the reasons already cited in your report, <br /> we do not see ANY north side window as acceptable allowances. <br /> TITLE 24 COMPLIANCE <br /> The appellant cites in the final paragraph of their appeal: "a window will probably be needed on that north side <br /> for either efficient lighting and or natural ventilation in one form or another", however, renderings were offered <br /> at the initial hearing on May 25, 2017 of three(3)different options in which the appellant can keep the same <br /> number of bedrooms and essentially the same layout without north facing windows that would allow for a <br /> window and egress in each room. It is common knowledge that there are multiple options for layouts when <br /> designing a space that does not currently exist. The following options have the same wall placements of the <br /> appellants' existing drawings, showing that movement of the windows CAN be done while still meeting their <br /> concerns of"efficient lighting and or natural ventilation" (see Figure 5-7). Please note, their request for <br /> "natural ventilation"speaks to the fact that they intend to have their windows open, thus making frosted <br /> 5 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.