My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
100317
>
11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2017 4:35:21 PM
Creation date
9/27/2017 3:37:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/3/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the staff report. Commissioner Allen specified concerns with the proposed massing, <br /> finding it is not compatible to other homes in the neighborhood. Additionally, she <br /> mentioned, the band between the rooflines is not aesthetically pleasing. said <br /> Commissioner Nagler concurred with Commissioner Allen's comments. He cited the <br /> workshop feedback, which made clear the concern about the style, massing, and <br /> architecture. Commissioner Nagler said he did not believe the applicant made enough <br /> effort to address the concerns of the Commission in the new design. <br /> Chair Balch challenged the FAR comments, asking if the project meets the <br /> requirements of FAR should the project be denied. <br /> Commissioners O'Connor, Nagler, and Allen agreed thatPit4could be denied under the <br /> purview of the design review criteria. g1144 <br /> Commissioner Brown challenged the comments`regarding the wall on>the front façade <br /> how/it architectural interest, pointing out hoit replaced the north facing,window which <br /> the Commission had requested be removedfa <br /> Kw- <br /> Commissioner Allen clarified, she did not he c <br /> avoncern over the new window <br /> placement, but with the three-layerrcake look of the front façade with the large band of <br /> stucco in the middle. She suggested title, roof hada different pitch or gable it could <br /> break up the massing, or if trim workAr quality siding w re..integrated rather than stucco <br /> it could add to the architectural interestCommissioner Allen,ecounted the Commission <br /> requesting at the workshop for the applicant to worktwitth staff on the design. <br /> Commissioner Ritterobserved`ihow had the applicant not appealed their approval they <br /> wouldn't be here Hecommentedx on parking, recognizing that converting garages to <br /> living spaces is becoming more icommon these days. However, Commissioner Ritter <br /> acknowledged there``is not enough street sparking for the garage to be converted, and <br /> therefore,Fhe concludedlindings 2, 4, and,5could not be made. <br /> Comm ssioner Naglerrrecognized, in response to the applicant's comments, that while <br /> the rooms are to be used;by grandchildren so the number of cars theoretically would not <br /> increase tithe Commission,cannot'assume the use by the current owner but must <br /> address the'potential use'for all residents going forward. <br /> Chair Balch, presentedffie dissenting opinion, suggesting a home outside of a PUD and <br /> without CC&R restrictions need only follow the City requirements. He elaborated, the <br /> massing and design were the Commission's concerns at the workshop and in his <br /> opinion the applicant tried to meet those concerns. Chair Balch challenged the <br /> Commission to explain, without designing from the dais, what it would take to meet the <br /> design criteria. He offered his support of the plans as submitted. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor acknowledged he was not present at the workshop. He <br /> affirmed Commissioner Nagler's comments regarding the number of bedrooms. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor stated he read the minutes from the workshop and his biggest <br /> concern was not discussed at that time, which is an enhancement to the neighborhood <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 23, 2017 Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.