11 - Laserfiche WebLink

4. The Applicants Contractor was the primary spokesperson for the project. I understand that this is not unusual. However what I did find highly unusual was the fact that the contractor was answering personal questions. a. For example; "what is the relationship, age and relationship of the occupants". The Contractor replied there were"9"although the Applicant was counting to "11". The contractor gave the ages and relationship. Seemingly the Contractor was in a sense'coaching'the Applicant (please also see 4c below). b. That resulted in one of the neighbors asking Staff, who the other couple was that was living there that seemed not to be a relative. After the Applicant was asked by Staff, she suddenly'remembered' that there were renters at the property as well, 'but they were moving out within a couple of months'. c. At one point, the Applicant was asked how many cars they owned. As the Applicant was answering, the Contractor held up four fingers to his cheek (as if he were in thought). Clearly this was a signal to the Applicant, who, as soon as she saw his signal immediately changed her answer to "four". Although she had already counted out "five" on her fingers - and was in the midst of counting even more, but stopped. I mention these as examples to point out that the Applicant clearly struggles with truthful responses, which should have been a factor in the decision. 5. In his decision, Adam commented that if they considered the fact that sometimes neighbors don't like each other, then half of all applications would be rejected. I found this totally inappropriate, unnecessary and offensive. Never did any of the neighbors or speakers even elude any dislike of the Applicants. In fact each of them went out of their way to de-personalize their concerns. 6. Lastly, and as a side note, I would like to mention that the venue for the meeting was extremely intimidating to all but the Applicant and Staff. a. The lack of separation stifled what normally would have been a more vigorous discussion, and more objections to the project would have been raised. Because of the tight quarters and the criminal history assodated with the property, the neighbors were clearly hesitant to speak and very timid. If the meeting had been held in the Chamber as scheduled, this would have been less of a factor.