11 - Laserfiche WebLink

EXHIBIT F Re: P17-0372 3552 Yellowstone Ct. Via email: 5/26/17 Gentlemen: I attended the Zoning Administrator's Public Hearing for the above-captioned project last night and am extremely concerned and somewhat dismayed. Adam Weinstein was the Chair. Despite the many concerns voiced by the neighbors and several (seemingly clear) conflicts with the Title 18 Zoning Ordinance, the project was approved. It is my opinion that this decision was incorrect and, at a minimum premature. The following are some of my concerns: 1. The plan submission package was incomplete. Some of the missing items, per city guidelines are: a. Site plan failed to show: lot dimensions, existing and proposed parking. b. The incomplete Site Plan that was submitted was in the wrong scale, per guidelines (minor, perhaps, but still a requirement). c. Photographs and photosets were not induded. This is a significant omission, as one of the neighbors directly adjacent to the proposed project made the comment that he would be better able to judge the impact to his property if he "could see a picture". What purpose do submittal requirements serve if they are arbitrarily allowed to be incomplete? 2. There was a substantial and material change to the plan that was revealed (orally) it the time of the hearing. a. Without the benefit of a drawing, I cannot specifically detail what the changes were, other than the fact that (apparently) the number of bedrooms was affected and potentially some exterior features.This is merely an educated guess on my part. b. A new/updated plan set was unavailable to reference or view at the time of the hearing. As a result, many attendees were confused as to the changes and had difficulty understanding what those changes were and what the potential impacts would be. c. How is this right to fair for the public to be denied their rightful and fair chance to review the most-current plans reflecting those (unknown) changes?