11 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Cravotta indicated that an arborist report was submitted because two of the trees were possibly considered to be heritage trees. Mr. Luchini found the arborist report in the submittal. Mr. Weinstein asked Mr. Luchini if the same holds true for photographs. Mr. Luchini replied that if the materials and colors of the proposed project will match the existing building, photographs are not always required. A neighbor asked if the tree removal is dependent on the approval of the proposal, since the trees are damaging the home. Mr. Weinstein replied that even if the application is denied, the applicant can come back to the City to request removal of the trees. Mr. Luchini clarified that the responsibility for approving the tree removal would then transfer from the Planning Division to the Landscape Architecture Division at that time. Mr. Weinstein asked if Mr. Johnson has any photos he would like to show. Mr. Johnson showed photos taken from his yard showing that the windows on the north side would affect his privacy. He also stated that the conversation about the structure is irrelevant because the drawings submitted are not structural drawings. Mr. Weinstein asked if anyone has other comments. Mrs. Robles commented that when the Johnson's added their second story, they put a window just a sidewalk's distance from the fence. The Robles' proposal puts the addition and windows further back. Mrs. Johnson added that although that is true, the site lines are totally different because their bathroom window is rarely opened and is frosted. Also the window looks into the site of the Robles' garage, not their house or backyard. Mr. Johnson commented that there is a history of transients and overdoses at the property and he does not want transients opening the window and invading his privacy. Mr. Cravotta stated that, concerning the police activity, whether the project is approved or not, the Robles family will still be living there. Mr. Weinstein asked the Robles or Mr. Cravotta to address the issue of the privacy concerns addressed by Mr. Johnson related to the fact that people can open/close the window on the north side. Mr. Cravotta replied that they have looked into options for safety and obscuring the view, for example using an aluminum screen instead of fiberglass. Mr. Johnson commented that this would address the occupant's privacy, but not the neighbor's. Mr. Johnson commented that his concern is his family's privacy, based on the history of the Robles property. Mr. Johnson added that his request is a small one. P17-0372, Robles, May 25, 2017