Laserfiche WebLink
story addition with a frosted window, but the window is not directly aligned with the <br /> Robles' yard. <br /> Mr. Weinstein asked to review the three options proposed by Mr. Johnson. He asked <br /> what the differences are between them. Mr. Johnson stated that the floor plans were <br /> different. <br /> Ed Broome asked if the site plan shows the dimension of the lot, as required for plan <br /> submittal. Mr. Luchini stated that the total exterior dimensions of the lot are not on the <br /> plans. <br /> Mr. Broome asked if it is a surveyed plan or if it is taken from the existing fence and <br /> retaining wall lines. If the latter, he has a concern since over time, fences come and go. <br /> Mr. Weinstein asked Mr. Broome what his concerns are about the dimensions. Mr. <br /> Broome's concerns are whether or not the dimensions are correct as far as the <br /> setbacks that are required and also that it is a requirement by the city to have the <br /> dimensions on the plans. <br /> Mr. Broome asked if there is an arborist report and photographs, as required for <br /> submittal. <br /> Mr. Weinstein stated that dimensioned plans, trees reports, and photographs of existing <br /> conditions are not required elements of applications for every single project; some <br /> projects that could affect existing trees warrant a tree report, while projects that wouldn't <br /> affect trees do not. . Mr. Luchini confirmed that a tree report was provided by the <br /> applicant. <br /> Mr. Broome read from the Pleasanton Municipal Code concerning zoning. He stated <br /> that this would be the only home in Pleasanton with 8 bedrooms and indicated that the <br /> largest home in Pleasanton currently is 8,100-square-feet with 7 bedrooms. He also <br /> suggested that the PMC defines a dwelling as 6 bedrooms maximum. Mr. Broome has <br /> concerns with on-street parking if off-street parking is not available. He is also <br /> concerned with the number of police calls (100+). <br /> Mr. Weinstein asked Mr. Broome what specifically about this proposal conflicts with <br /> issues of preserving public health and safety and retaining single family residential <br /> districts for family use. <br /> Mr. Broome replied that there seems to be non-family members living there currently <br /> and that the character of the occupants is not something that is conducive with what he <br /> would want as a home. He is also concerned that the project is too big for the <br /> neighborhood use. <br /> Mr. Weinstein asked Mr.Broome to clarify the 6-room cap. Mr. Broome replied that this <br /> relates to transitional homes, but not to single family residences. <br /> Mr. Weinstein asked for any other comments from the public. <br /> P17-0372, Robles, May 25, 2017 <br />