My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
100317
>
11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2017 4:35:21 PM
Creation date
9/27/2017 3:37:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/3/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT 5 <br /> THE CITY OF <br /> t(�L .tiG..r -�I <br /> ® DIm <br /> PLEASA NTON. <br /> M EMORANDU <br /> Date: July 12, 2017 <br /> To: Members of the Planning Commission <br /> From: Planning Division <br /> City Attorney's Office <br /> Subject: Item 6.a. <br /> P17-0372 <br /> 3552 Yellowstone Court <br /> This memo was prepared to address questions staff received from members of the Planning <br /> Commission after publication of the staff report regarding the appeal of the Zoning <br /> Administrator's approval of an application for Administrative Design Review at 3552 <br /> Yellowstone Court. This memo is divided into two sections as follows: <br /> ➢ Section 1 —questions regarding the standard and scope that the commission should follow <br /> in evaluating the project; and <br /> ➢ Section 2 —miscellaneous questions regarding the project. <br /> Section 1: Standard/Scope of Application Review <br /> • What is the standard of review for this application? <br /> Per Section 18.20.060(c) of the Municipal Code, the Planning Commission's review of the <br /> project is de novo, "as if the appeal of the zoning administrator's action were a new <br /> application before the commission or council." Accordingly, the Planning Commission is <br /> not bound by the conclusions or assumptions made by the Zoning Administrator in the <br /> previous conditional approval of the project. The Commission may: deny the appeal and <br /> uphold the Zoning Administrator's decision; uphold the appeal and grant the appellant's <br /> request for modification; approve the application but further modify the conditions of <br /> approval; or deny the original application. <br /> o What is the Planning Commission's scope of review for this application? <br /> The project being considered is a Design Review application. Per the Municipal Code, the <br /> Planning Commission, in considering Design Review applications, is limited to focusing on <br /> the physical/design elements (and not the operational elements) of a project. Section <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.