My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
091817
>
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2017 12:00:47 PM
Creation date
9/18/2017 10:00:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/18/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JDEDZ PROJECT REVIEW <br /> SEPTEMBER 2017 <br /> III: OTHER PROJECT FINANCING <br /> In addition to the Sales Tax Sharing Agreement analyzed above, the JDEDZ relies on additional <br /> funding sources. Two of those are noteworthy here as they impact the availability of capital <br /> improvement funds for transportation projects elsewhere in the city, the Traffic Impact Fee. <br /> Since 1998, the City of Pleasanton has maintained a TIF fund for transportation needs <br /> throughout the city. The guiding document for the program was updated in 2010. The <br /> proposed funding for the Costco component of the JDEDZ calls on TIF for two distinct pools of <br /> money: <br /> 1. $6.4 million from existing TIF funds for Stoneridge Drive and 1-680 onramp <br /> improvements <br /> 2. $3.7 million from Costco's project-specific TIF payment <br /> We will briefly discuss each of these sources separately. <br /> Stoneridge Drive and 1-680 Onramp Improvements: $6.4 million <br /> The primary access point to the Costco will be on Johnson Drive north from Stoneridge Drive. <br /> The project calls for an expansion of a curved portion of Johnson Drive to seven lanes to <br /> accommodate customers and suppliers to the Costco site. The alternative for Costco access is <br /> a much longer stretch of Johnson Drive to the north and east, using Owens Drive and Clorox <br /> Way to access Hopyard Road, a major thoroughfare. To facilitate anticipated Costco traffic from <br /> the south, the project calls for widening Stoneridge to feed both the new Johnson Drive lanes <br /> and a new second onramp lane to northbound 1-680. <br /> The city proposes to fund this improvement (both the Stoneridge widening and the second <br /> onramp lane it will feed) using existing TIF funds, generated by other developments through the <br /> years. However, the appropriateness of this allocation of TIF money is problematic. <br /> First, the current Traffic Impact Fee and Nexus Report (2010, TJKM Transportation <br /> Consultants), does not appear to include the Stoneridge onramp in the TIF spending plan. It <br /> includes a widening of Stoneridge over 1-680 (estimated at $4.65 million in 2010) and a modest <br /> reworking of the Stoneridge-Johnson intersection ($0.4 million). <br /> Interestingly, the 1998 iteration of the TIF "Development Fee Project List" did include an <br /> estimated $8 million expenditure for 1-680 onramps from Stoneridge, but this line item was <br /> apparently discarded in the 2010 update. <br /> Second, the current Capital Improvement Program for the city (2017/18—2020/21) does <br /> include a $6.4 million item specifically for the JDEDZ described as "Stoneridge Drive and 1-680 <br /> Northbound Widening." That project is included in a list and discussion of"City Council CIP <br /> Priority Projects." The text there is clear in stating that, "in the event the JDEDZ is not approved <br /> the reserve would return to fund balance to be reprogrammed for other General Plan eligible <br /> projects." In other words, should the Costco and JDEDZ not go forward, there would be no <br /> need for the onramp expansion through at least FY 2020/21. <br /> Civic Economics is in no position to opine on the legality of this proposed expenditure and <br /> recommends that interested citizens review the matter with local counsel. However, legality <br /> aside, this $6.4 million would be made available for other needed transportation projects <br /> Civic Economics 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.