My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
07
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
090517
>
07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2017 3:56:08 PM
Creation date
8/30/2017 1:03:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/5/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
07
Document Relationships
07 ATTACHMENT 2
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2017\090517
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Brown said he believes the Commission is getting ahead of themselves <br /> by trying to design future dealerships and that he agrees with Commissioner O'Connor <br /> that the applicant will presumably know the market and design the lots to maximize his <br /> revenue. <br /> Vice Chair Nagler concluded that the Commissioners have made consistent comments <br /> that suggest a way to substantially improve the application. He agreed with all of the <br /> comments and asked staff to address the issues of drainage, runoff, grading, and the <br /> like when the lot is built with the understanding that a building will someday be built on <br /> Lot #2. Vice Chair Nagler added that what has changed on this auto mall site since the <br /> original permit was issued and the plan was adopted is the development across the <br /> street and the increased amount of traffic. He elaborated on how the freeway entrance <br /> with the Stoneridge extension is used as a major point of entrance and exit to the City <br /> and not just to get to those businesses, so the appearance of this vacant lot actually has <br /> taken on more importance to us as a City than when the whole site was initially <br /> permitted. Therefore, Vice Chair Nagler agreed that he would like to see additional <br /> landscaping along the perimeter of the property when the application comes back to the <br /> Commission. <br /> Mr. Beaudin summarized that the Commission would like to see landscape <br /> improvements and lighting concerns addressed: He asked if options for the future <br /> layouts, as requested by Commissioner Allen, were of interest to the majority of the <br /> Commission or if they were comfortable with the layout as proposed knowing it could <br /> change when dealership#2 and #3 submit their applications. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor replied that he is comfortable with the layout as is <br /> Commissioner Ritter agreed with Commissioner Allen with regard to ensuring proper <br /> drainage. <br /> Mr. Beaudin assured the Commission that staff will have a grading and drainage plan <br /> with the site plan. <br /> Commissioner Brown agreed that he is comfortable with the layout as proposed. <br /> Commissioner Allen agreed with the layout as proposed. <br /> Mr. Beaudin asked if the Commission was interested in the applicant producing a <br /> market analysis or if they were comfortable with leaving it up to the applicant to watch <br /> what the market brings, and respond at that time. <br /> Vice Chair Nagler replied that he believes the applicant will design the property in a way <br /> to maximize his profits. He added though, that it would be in the City's best interest to <br /> be sure the site looks as appealing as possible to attract those future opportunities. <br /> The Commission agreed unanimously. <br /> Mr. Beaudin concluded that staff would focus on the landscaping, lighting, and drainage <br /> and move forward with the shared parking arrangement that's been proposed to future <br /> dealership#2. <br /> DRAFT EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 28, 2017 Page 10 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.