My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
07
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
090517
>
07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2017 3:56:08 PM
Creation date
8/30/2017 1:03:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/5/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
07
Document Relationships
07 ATTACHMENT 2
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2017\090517
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Vice Chair Nagler asked the applicant representative if she was aware of any <br /> dealerships that would operate in that configuration of a site. <br /> The applicant representative replied she had come across one in Mountain View—a <br /> smaller, three-story BMW dealership in the middle of the city. <br /> Commissioner Allen elaborated on Vice Chair Nagler's question, explaining how she <br /> understood his question to mean within Pleasanton are there opportunities, and <br /> knowing we already have a BMW dealership and a BMW Mini dealership associated <br /> with it which is 14,000 square feet, are there other dealerships and what is the market <br /> opportunity for dealerships of that size that aren't already in Pleasanton. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor added how it also begs the question as to whether we are <br /> sacrificing Lot 2. Lot 3 is the largest of the three. He said it just seems odd that we <br /> would maybe put ourselves in a position where we can't find a dealership to take that <br /> small of a lot when we have another lot right next to it that's larger than even the <br /> Chrysler lot. <br /> Commissioner Brown brought up the fact the'workshop is in regards to the parking lot <br /> which hasn't materially changed between the PUD-106 plan and what's proposed <br /> tonight. He expressed concern that the issue of a potential future application for the <br /> dealership#2 is immaterial to this.application. <br /> Mr. Weinstein clarified, restating Ms.. Hagen's previous comment, which was that there <br /> absolutely will be the opportunity in the future when future dealerships come to <br /> reconfigure dealership#3 and dealership #2. He reminded the Commission that there is <br /> flexibility to do that because each dealership that comes in will need its own PUD <br /> development plan. <br /> Commissioner Ritter asked if dealerships generally do land leases or do they own the <br /> land and the building. More specifically, he asked the applicant representative, is Mr. <br /> Zaheri interested in selling these, lots off or just land leasing them. <br /> The applicant representative was unsure but believed he would either lease the land or <br /> remain the business and land owner. <br /> Ms. Hagen offered to provide further information after discussing with the applicant. <br /> Commissioner Ritter asked if CarMax owned the property. <br /> Ms. Hagen replied, yes, CarMax does own the property. <br /> The applicant representative said Mr. Zaheri has mentioned many times that he actually <br /> bought this land and he developed phase 1 and he does not have anything in mind yet <br /> for those two dealership sites yet he still does need the parking spaces that could serve <br /> #1. Furthermore, he has expressed interest in moving around some of the parcels in the <br /> future to satisfy other needs. <br /> DRAFT EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 28, 2017 Page 6 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.