07 - Laserfiche WebLink

Ms. Hagen agreed and further explained that it was all part of the same specific plan. Stoneridge Creek, Pacific Pearl, this site as well as the community park were all conceptualized together. So the only permitted use on this property has always been auto-related dealerships. The Commission took a five-minute break. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Vice Chair Nagler welcomed the applicant and asked her if she had any comments on the project in general or background. The applicant representative indicated that the first phase had been developed (the Chrysler dealership) but that the remaining 16 acres had not She said the applicant had an idea of how to lay out the future dealerships, but again, that could change based on the actual design. She explained how the gravel space would be given back to the dealership as soon as that portion of the site is developed. Everything else, she said, is legal. Vice Chair Nagler asked the applicant representative to clarify that the lot the applicant is asking to be built now is to replace the temporary gravel lot. The applicant representative said yes, the applicant needs some additional parking that would serve the dealership now, but in the future it will be given back to the south side. Vice Chair Nagler asked the applicant representative to confirm that when the application says that it's going to be shared, shared doesn't mean that both dealerships will have vehicles; that she's saying that when dealership #2 is developed, that the subject parking lot will no longer be accessible to the Chrysler dealership. The applicant representative said it will be accessible. She explained that the first top row and the second top row will be given to one dealership, the middle row will still be used by Chrysler Jeep Dodge, and the bottom two rows will be given to the developer of dealership #2. Vice Chair Nagler asked the applicant representative why they chose to ask that this portion be paved as opposed to where the temporary gravel lot is. He explained how the Chrysler dealership now has a temporary permit to use that parking lot (shown in yellow), and the proposal is to build the lot between the Chrysler dealership and dealership #2 (shown in pink). He asked why the proposal is asking for the parking lot be built there as opposed to where the temporary parking lot is. He described how the reason for asking the question is because the acreage allocated to dealership #3 is much larger than what's been allocated to #2, and as proposed it could necessitate more re-arranging in the future than necessary. The applicant representative said she did not have an answer to the question. Vice Chair Nagler asked if there are any immediate potential occupants or plans for dealership #2. DRAFT EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 28, 2017 Page 4 of 10