Laserfiche WebLink
Total Anticipated On-going Tax Revenues Associated with JDEDZ <br /> Attachment 2 identifies the total expected net additional tax revenues that the JDEDZ will <br /> generate in the first 25-years including Sales Taxes, Property Taxes, Transient Occupancy <br /> Taxes (TOT), and Vehicle In-lieu taxes6. As described in Attachment 4, the City is <br /> expected to receive a total of $84.2 million in net new tax revenues in the first 25-years of <br /> the JDEDZ. Of that amount, under the proposed sales tax sharing proposal with Costco, <br /> the City would receive $76.4 million or 91% of those new revenues and Costco would <br /> receive $7.8 million or 9% of those new revenues. <br /> Using Growth in Taxes to Fund Infrastructure Improvements in Other Cities <br /> While the City of Pleasanton has not used tax revenues generated by a development to <br /> help fund transportation improvements required for that development, this practice has <br /> been utilized in other cities. For example, Livermore, Ukiah and Manteca used some of the <br /> sales tax growth from development to help pay for infrastructure improvements required by <br /> development. California's Redevelopment Agencies regularly utilized property tax growth <br /> generated by development (tax increment financing) to help pay for the infrastructure <br /> improvements required for the development to occur. Further, cities routinely use tax <br /> sharing agreements to attract large sales tax generating businesses to their communities <br /> including the cities of Dublin, Pittsburg, Mountain View, Elk Grove and Manteca. <br /> POLICY QUESTION #2: What is Council's preferred financing option at this time for <br /> the cost of the necessary transportation improvements? <br /> FISCAL IMPACT <br /> ALH Economics, an urban and regional economic consulting firm under contract to the <br /> City, prepared a fiscal impact analysis of the JDEDZ that was published as part of the <br /> FSEIR. <br /> The fiscal impact analysis results indicate that on a worst-case basis, assuming that all <br /> diverted sales are diverted from Pleasanton retailers (as opposed to retailers outside of <br /> Pleasanton), the JDEDZ is anticipated to generate a projected $1.4 to $1.7 million annual <br /> contribution to the City's General Fund' at the completion of the first phase (which includes <br /> the club retail and hotel uses). This net revenue estimate (takes into account both sales <br /> tax and property tax) increases to $2.1 to $2.3 million annually8 upon full buildout of the <br /> JDEDZ. At full buildout these net fiscal revenues represent an annual contribution <br /> equivalent to approximately 2.1 percent to 2.3 percent of the City's General Fund <br /> expenditures. These revenue estimates do not include any City contributions to the <br /> transportation improvements required by the JDEDZ. <br /> Please refer to Attachment 2, Annual Net Fiscal Impact Analysis, for a summary of the <br /> fiscal analysis. In addition to the revenue shown in Attachment 2 (which focuses on City <br /> revenues and expenditures), property taxes generated from the JDEDZ would provide <br /> approximately $277,440 in annual revenue to the Pleasanton Unified School District <br /> 6 All tax revenues estimates exclude estimates of leakage from revenues currently received from other <br /> Pleasanton stores. Thus, the revenues identified in Attachment 2 would be new to Pleasanton. <br /> In 2015/16 dollars. <br /> 8 In 2015/16 dollars. <br /> Page 15 of 16 <br />