Laserfiche WebLink
Funding the Remaining $13,570,000 of Estimated Design and Construction Costs <br /> Of the remaining $13.6 million in estimated design and construction costs to be funded, <br /> Costco would cover $6,785,000 through a cash contribution. $3.7 million of that is Costco's <br /> TIF contribution that would be converted to cash. The remaining $6,785,000 could be <br /> funded by one of the following three ways: (1) sales tax sharing agreement with Costco, <br /> (2) City inter-fund loan, or (3) traditional debt through bond issuance or a bank loan. Of <br /> course, there is a fourth option to do nothing and not proceed with the JDEDZ <br /> transportation improvements. The three funding options are discussed below. <br /> 1. Sales Tax Sharing Agreement with Costco <br /> Costco would front the $6,785,000 and be repaid through sales tax sharing <br /> agreement not to exceed 25-years at 1.5% interest with Costco where Costco <br /> receives 40% of the sales tax generated by the Costco store and the City would <br /> receive 60%. <br /> Analysis of Proposed Sales Tax Sharing Agreement with Costco <br /> The proposed $6.8 million2 25-year sales tax sharing agreement at 1.5% interest <br /> with Costco would result in total sales tax allocations to Costco of $8.2 million <br /> assuming a full 25-year amortization period. The City would pay that amount to <br /> Costco through annual payments of up to 40% of the sales tax generated from the <br /> Costco on Johnson Drive. The City will receive at least 60% of the sales tax <br /> proceeds from the proposed Costco store on Johnson Drive. <br /> Attachment 3 illustrates how the Costco sales tax sharing agreement would work. In <br /> this analysis, staff used the sales tax estimate prepared by ALH ECON for the <br /> starting year of $926,7093 and assumed it would grow by 3% annually over the <br /> 25-year period. Under these assumptions, Costco would receive the $7.8 million by <br /> 2035/36 or 17 years after the Costco store opened which will fulfill the City's sales <br /> tax sharing obligation and the City would receive 100% of the Sales Tax revenues <br /> thereafter. The 17 year amortization period will reduce the interest expenses by <br /> approximately $400,000 ($8.2 million with 25-year amortization vs. $7.8 million with <br /> a 17-year amortization period). During that same period of time, the City would have <br /> received approximately $12.4 million in sales tax revenues that it would have not <br /> otherwise received. Over the 25-year term of the agreement, the City would receive <br /> almost $26 million in sales tax revenues. <br /> 2. City Inter-fund Loan <br /> Another option to fund the $6.8 million would be for the City to provide a loan from <br /> another City fund that would be repaid at approximately 1.0 to 1.5% interest with <br /> increased tax revenues. Under this scenario, the City would advance the <br /> $6.8 million from another fund and repay that fund over time with a portion of <br /> increased tax revenues generated by the JDEDZ. The City fund with sufficient <br /> 2 The$6,785,000 is rounded up to$6.8 million for this analysis. <br /> 3 ALH ECON's sales tax estimates take into account leakage from other stores in Pleasanton. In other words, <br /> the$926,709 in estimated Sales Tax revenues in the first year of the Costco store being operational on <br /> Johnson Dive would be new revenues to the City. <br /> Page 12 of 16 <br />