My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 092816
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 092816
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:55:30 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:47:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/28/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Brown: Okay, that's what I was thinking <br />Dolan: That's what we were just talking about. <br />Commissioner Brown: And that's 3.74 acres? <br />Dolan: Right. <br />Commissioner Brown: Okay, in terms of the Cultural Arts Center versus the Firehouse <br />Arts Center, I noticed it's listed on one of the programs. Did the Cultural Arts Center <br />predate the Firehouse Arts Center? And I guess one of the biggest questions I had, is it <br />no longer needed? <br />Dolan: It's a much bigger facility. I believe it was going to seat 800 or so, much bigger <br />than the 200 seats or less in the Firehouse Arts Center. I think they were thinking big <br />back then and they wanted both. <br />Commissioner Balch: But it was in connection with Amador Pavilion, right? Because we <br />didn't know what the City was going to do with Amador and it was almost a replacement <br />but expansion of it is what I remember. <br />Dolan: So, and you probably know more about that history than I do. I don't know that I <br />have the answer, but if others do... <br />Commissioner Brown: No, I was just wondering where the need went, right? Obviously <br />we're losing something to get this. <br />Commissioner Balch: During the Parks and Rec Master Plan process the question was <br />raised of replacement of facilities at Amador, which is programmed through Community <br />Services, what was going to happen to that facility because it's a joint venture with the <br />school district? I think it's lease was coming due or coming up or something like that <br />and then as Mr. Dolan spoke to, the Community Center came up also in the Park and <br />Rec process because a teen use center or something for teen programming was an <br />identified need. <br />Commissioner Brown: Maybe this is a question for Mr. Nagler. Is it assumed that if <br />we're going to do this and wait and see on the two -story parking garage that we would <br />build the supports to handle a third story if we wanted to add it later? <br />Dolan: I think so, but I think if Commissioner Nagler remembers, he's the second task <br />force member who will have told me that and I think when I listen to the tape, I'll <br />probably find that they want it to be three stories. And so I think that's what's going to <br />happen. We're going to have an errata here that shows the task force recommended <br />three stories, but if we only built it two, we would definitely build it with the ability to <br />expand. We had a conversation about that more than once and most people thought <br />that's just inefficient. It always costs you a lot more when you add the story later than <br />just biting the bullet and doing it first. It's not a very complex or expensive structure. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 28, 2016 Page 4 of 32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.