My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 083116
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 083116
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:53:24 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:42:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/31/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The Minutes of the August 10, 2016 Meeting were approved, as amended. <br />3. MEETING OPEN FOR ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE TO ADDRESS THE <br />PLANNING COMMISSION ON ANY ITEM WHICH IS NOT ALREADY ON THE <br />AGENDA <br />There were no members of the audience wishing to address the Commission. <br />4. REVISIONS TO THE AGENDA <br />There were no revisions to the agenda. <br />5. CONSENT CALENDAR <br />Consent Calendar items are considered routine and will be enacted, approved, or <br />adopted by one motion unless a request for removal for discussion or <br />explanation is received from the Planning Commission or a member of the public <br />by submitting a speaker card for that item. <br />6. PUBLIC HEARING AND OTHER MATTERS <br />a. P16 -1386, TRACT 8259. and P16 -1385, Ponderosa Homes <br />Work Session to review and receive comments on an application to amend <br />the General Plan Land Use designation from Public and Institutional to <br />Medium Density Residential to allow for the demolition of the existing religious <br />building and development of up to 37 homes on the approximately 9 -acre site <br />located at 6900 Valley Trails Drive. Zoning for the property is R -1 -6,500 (One - <br />Family Residential) District. <br />Jay Lee presented the staff report and described the scope, layout, and key elements of <br />the proposal. <br />Commissioner Allen: I'm not used to seeing projects when we have a General Plan that <br />is inconsistent with zoning and so I'm trying to understand the implications. Does the <br />General Plan trump the zoning or does the zoning trump the General Plan? <br />Weinstein: When there's an inconsistency between the zoning and the General Plan, <br />the General Plan would govern. <br />Commissioner Allen: Okay. The second question is if we were to build this prior to 2022 <br />and build it as mid - density, would we receive any RHNA credit for it now or would it <br />carry over the RHNA credit after 2022? When I say RHNA for people who don't know, <br />it's Regional Housing Needs Allocation. We have an allocation through 2022 and so the <br />question is does this help us meet that or would it help us after 2022 if we were to build <br />it now? <br />Weinstein: Right, so if it's re- designated now. RHNA really focuses on zoning, but <br />obviously for zoning to work, the zoning for different housing sites has to be consistent <br />with General Plan land use designations. Assuming we change the land use <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 31, 2016 Page 3 of 58 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.