My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 082416
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 082416
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:48:16 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:39:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/24/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
minimum of two spaces and having two guest parking spaces was what we were trying <br />to achieve. The concern with leaving the garage at the front was that the drive - through <br />tandem space; the outdoor space is essentially just a side yard patio. So the idea of <br />moving the garage forward makes it real clear that there's a parking pad and a garage <br />and it's still a tandem configuration and it still involves what it involves with tandem but <br />that's the reason we picked one option over the other. <br />Commissioner Balch: If I could just make a quick statement and to echo what staff has <br />just said, the fact that its tandem already adds a complication that we typically don't like <br />and then on top of the tandem, to have the garage first and then the pad second, I <br />completely understand staff's position on that because we typically don't like tandem, or <br />at least I think that's what we've said in the past. We don't like tandem, and then if <br />you're adding tandem and adding this element that you have to go through, I mean, I <br />can't see the future but I think I can foresee problems here. I can also foresee that <br />someone's going to park in that little spot between 1 and 11 right at that little corner. <br />Chair Ritter: Like a boat? <br />Commissioner Balch: Well, like your car because you don't want to go through a garage <br />to get to the pad on the other side. So .... I'll say to come out in a straw poll, I'm leaning <br />towards staff's recommendation. <br />Commissioner Balch: The garage is towards the back which would require you to drive <br />through it with this configuration and staff says you flip. <br />Commissioner Brown: The other thing I noticed though is the exit from the garage is on <br />the east side so you're exiting towards Building 10 or did I misread the.... <br />Commissioner Balch: It flipped. So when looking here, the door.... <br />Commissioner Brown: Oh, I see the door in the diagram. So if you were to move that <br />garage up to the pinch point, would you not move that door down? <br />Commissioner Balch: The garage isn't built, so yeah, the garage you could redesign so <br />your door is located at the southern end, or call that the west end side and then yes, <br />you presumably create a breezeway or something. <br />Commissioner Brown: In which case you're clear to get out of the garage with an <br />increase in two feet. <br />Commissioner Nagler: Well the distance between the two structures would remain the <br />same obviously. You'd just locate the door so you could easily access past the door. <br />Commissioner Balch: O'Connor and I are in favor of staff. Anyone else want to come <br />out on a straw poll so we can move forward? <br />Commissioner Nagler: I agree. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 24, 2016 Page 8 of 39 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.