My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 082416
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 082416
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:48:16 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:39:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/24/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
With that, I would ask if you had any questions of me. If they're architecturally specific, <br />I've got Adam Gardner here who's got the next speaker card who can probably address <br />those more intelligently than I can. <br />Adam Gardner: Good evening, Adam Gardner with William Hezmalhalch Architects, <br />again I want to thank everybody for their input in getting us where we are tonight. <br />There's one condition of approval I just wanted to address and that's the relocation of <br />the detached garage for the historic home. The condition requires that the garage and <br />the tandem parking space be flipped and I just wanted to explain how we got to where <br />we are with the plan. The existing house was essentially located on the site currently so <br />we pushed it off to the west side and tried to create kind of a single family environment <br />with a front yard and generous side yard. If we take that detached garage which is <br />essentially an alleyway and push it up towards St. John Street, I think it will really crowd <br />the house quite a bit. We have about a total of 15 feet from the house to the property <br />line and the garage should be somewhere in the 11 to 12 feet, so we'll wind up with <br />about 3 to 4 feet and kind of squeeze by. The condition of approval is to require that the <br />garage not be used for storage which shows that it would need to be accessible for <br />garage space and then we do have the garage rear door and the idea is that we just <br />drive through and use that pad parking for the second parking space. So we'd like your <br />consideration to not require us to push the garage back; to keep the space around the <br />house and the integrity of the existing home intact. So if you have any questions about <br />the architecture, I'd be happy to answer them. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: So I have one and maybe I misunderstood, but the way the <br />plan is drawn today with the pad closer to St. John, do you have a driveway coming off <br />of St. John to get to that pad? <br />Gardner: No, we do not. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: Only going through the garage? <br />Gardner: Only going through the garage. The garage has two garage doors, one at the <br />front off of the alley and one at the rear of the garage which is towards St. John. So you <br />drive through the garage to access the second parking space. And the idea there again <br />was to reduce curb cuts off the street and to provide more parking. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: Okay, thank you. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Commissioner Brown: Why don't we start with first the applicant's concern regarding the <br />carport? <br />Chair Ritter: Okay, so that's one of the conditions that staff proposed. What's the feeling <br />on modifying that? Just the carport discussion. <br />Commissioner Balch: Maybe we should ask what staff's position is on it and why; if they <br />could explain or elaborate. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 24, 2016 Page 6 of 39 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.