PC 082416 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Nagler: Got it. Probably now is not the time, but I have some questions about the look of the building too, but they're more comments though so thank you. Commissioner Balch: I asked staff earlier and I think I see it now, but my question is about fire access to Unit 1. To confirm, staff let me know that fire had looked at the design and confirmed they would have proper access for a truck and service to Unit 1 for example. And I see it now. I'm just confirming —it's between 8 and 9. It's the walkway path that would let you have access and that's the path fire would access to get to the back here, right? Weinstein: That's right. The Fire Department is not going to be maneuvering the fire truck into this driveway. They're going to be parking the truck on St. John Street adjacent to the project and then pulling in a fire hose through that pedestrian walkway between, as Mr. Balch said, Buildings 8 and 9. Commissioner Balch: Okay, and then my other quick question was when the item was on the initial agenda and then when it got back here, there were some comments it seemed from residents related to the rear fence. Has there been any further development or comment when the item got re- agendized? Weinstein: We haven't heard anything. Commissioner Balch: Okay, no additional comments at this time. Thank you Brown: On page 21 at the bottom around the garage use, I noted the condition that the residents will have restrictions as part of the approval around making sure that the parking is park -able within the garages. Is that a standard term or is that specific to this PUD? Otto: I've got different page numbers than you, but we do normally include that condition when we definitely want to make sure to provide the parking. We normally wouldn't put this on a typical subdivision that has street parking and driveway parking, but when we're tight on sites when there is no driveway parking and limited on- street parking, we want to put that in there and make sure it's in the CC &R's, a PUD condition, and disclosure, etc. Commissioner Brown: Okay. I mean, obviously enforcement is another issue but it's a good condition. I was just wondering if it's a condition that's a standard condition being a Downtown Plan or just because, so I know for future projects. Otto: I think it's probably included in the last five or six Downtown projects and we included it in some of the other high density residential projects that were approved throughout town as well. Commissioner Brown: Okay, I don't recall seeing it in the Irby Ranch and that's why I ask. And then I had one final question. In the pictures you showed fences between the three buildings on the southern side; Lots 1 through 6. 1 was just wondering, is that fence halfway between or is it pushed towards the back? I'm referring to Figure 3 in the staff report on page 11, the fence that's shown between the three buildings on the southern lots, I'm just wondering is that front, mid or back? PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 24, 2016 Page 4 of 39