My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 082416
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 082416
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:48:16 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:39:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/24/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Chair Ritter: They did our last one, didn't they? <br />Beaudin: We use other consultants too though. Just to be clear, they're popular but <br />they're not the only ones. <br />Chair Ritter: They did the Dublin one and I believe.... they know our area. <br />Beaudin: They worked in Walnut Creek. They did the parking plan for downtown Walnut <br />Creek which is a different animal than our downtown, but they've got a lot of experience <br />with this work. <br />Commissioner Brown: Yes, on the current revision of the Bike /Ped Plan, they were the <br />only ones who provided a full response and part of the answer from the other is that <br />they figured Fehr and Peers would put it in. One other comment I was going to make is <br />Figure 10 —if you overlay that on the proposed locations for a parking structure, the <br />Bank of America one looks like a candidate in that all three of those from a five minute <br />walk perspective it targets whereas the Hardware site would be outside of the main <br />treatment at Bernal. So it seemed to strike a good compromise, but in general, I'm really <br />impressed with the report, the thoroughness of it, and I was quite pleased. I think it's <br />more to Jack's point, Figure 11 actually shows that effective walkway that we were <br />talking about, although I would challenge whether or not the yellow line Main Street is <br />actually accurate. I would say that's probably red based on personal experiences. <br />Commissioner Balch: I had one other additional comment which was the transportation <br />corridor where we actually already have parking built out, specifically behind McKay's, <br />possibly as you say a business establishment, I noticed the parking lot of the neighbor <br />has a back curve, but it stops significantly shy -in fact there's a grade change —let's say <br />a 15 feet grade change, then the parking we're actually utilizing on DG or gravel on that <br />site, there's a very wide section where it appears where the owners are parking. Is that <br />part of the transportation corridor that could be tapped into? <br />Beaudin: I don't know exactly the location of the corridor but its 75 feet wide so it very <br />well could extend beyond the top of the bank that's there and that slope. I would <br />imagine that some of that is our property for the corridor. <br />Commissioner Balch: And I understand we have the cleanup issue which is why I tread <br />lightly about doing that, but you know, doing that, that corridor approximately from <br />behind McKay's and where you have to make the right onto Bernal, it's only single wide <br />where you've got... <br />Beaudin: ... a perpendicular bar, and I think the plan does show having perpendicular <br />parking on both sides, and my concern is I think they have not left us room for bike /ped <br />improvements so we do need to look at that area a little more carefully as we refine the <br />plan and finalize it, but there's likely supply to be had there as well. <br />Commissioner Balch: Probably more simply than some of these other things we were so <br />frown on. <br />Beaudin: Yeah, I think the transportation corridor in general we're just having a hard <br />look at. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 24, 2016 Page 35 of 39 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.