PC 082416 - Laserfiche WebLink

know the last time we did it whether we tried to incorporate land costs or not or whether it was just an improvement cost. So here's where it starts to get more technical than I've been able to dig into. This is the kind of research I would want to know answers to. You know, is the $19,000 literally improving a lot? You know, the stormwater, the lighting, the landscaping that goes with the pavement, the paint, or is that all of that plus the land and the approval process that you have to go through, and I just have not done that kind of analysis up to this point. So it would be a separate planning effort. It would be something we would have to assign staff resources to and ultimately when we're talking about adjusting numbers in the code that relate to development costs, I think it is a policy discussion and a decision that should come from the City Council. Commissioner Nagler: That's my point, recommending it to the Council. Beaudin: Yeah, and they're not changing the work plan at this point in time and something would have to come off if something were to come on. We're nearing the end of the two year window. Essentially we will be talking about the work plan starting early 2017 and getting it finalized by February. That's where I'm at with it. Chair Ritter: Okay and it seems like what you're asking from us is to help prioritize Table 1 or just to see what's most important. Beaudin: What page are you on Pamela? Pamela Ott: I'm on page 57. Table 17, Section 6 which is the Implementation Plan. It seems like a logical place to be. Beaudin: It is page 57/58. It's Chapter 6; the implementation plan and Table 17 is the managing the existing parking supply table, but there are also parking supply tables on the following pages in Table 17 and 18. So if you see something in there that you think that's just doesn't work for me, we'd love to know that. It's a task, right? To create a criteria list and a methodology to prioritize these things is something we're all working on right now. I wouldn't expect you to do that at the dais tonight, but if you have specific concerns about anything you see or if you think something is in a near term bucket that should be in an immediate bucket, those would be the kinds of things like bike parking in the park. Commissioner Balch: I happened to notice that in the non -page numbered version, it's Exhibit C, which was mentioned earlier, I happened to notice they had several suggestions and one of the suggestions was that "in -lieu parking fees are agreements and exceptions where public parking is provided on private sites." So in light of Commissioner Nagler's comment, I also support the in -lieu parking being looked at in a reasonably timely manner because I think the iron is hot. I'll leave it as something I do support. I think the other things they've mentioned and that I've mentioned earlier with them, the bike racks at opportune spots and timing to that, we understand those are easy, low hanging fruit fixes and I think you guys are doing a great job trying to figure out anything to get.... Beaudin: So can I do this a different way then? If you all think that, if there's a consensus that we should evaluate in -lieu parking fees, than make it an immediate or PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 24, 2016 Page 29 of 39