My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 081016
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 081016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:47:05 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:36:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/10/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
low cost housing complex because this is not what Irby Ranch LLC wants nor is it <br />something the community wants. She likened it to the Bernal property when <br />Township Square was built out, but there was a much stronger tie -in to the <br />apartments and homes and financing, and she asked to see this with Sunflower <br />Hill; <br />2. She would like to see Sunflower Hill get more than 19 units which helps them to <br />have better financial strength to sustain themselves. <br />3. She would like to see the architecture baked a little bit more which includes <br />discussions of the Commission and staff discussions. Her ideal vision is the front <br />facing homes along Stanley should feel like a gateway from First Street through <br />Stanley into Pleasanton, and these do not feel that way yet to her. Setbacks in <br />front should be greater, landscaping built out more and to ensure that the three - <br />story buildings are not seen from Stanley. <br />Commissioner Allen said if she could see these three things, she could support the <br />project solely because of Sunflower Hill and she would like the developer to also be in <br />the same capacity; that the reason they are here is because of Sunflower Hill. <br />Commissioner Nagler said on Commissioner Allen's desire that there be a tie -in <br />between the building of the development and Sunflower Hill, what he was trying to get <br />to earlier is that it is possible to time the buildout of the development through the Growth <br />Management Plan to a timetable of getting Sunflower Hill built such that the last piece of <br />development could not occur by virtue of the Growth Management Plan until it was clear <br />that Sunflower Hill was being built. <br />Ms. Hagen said the Growth Management Plan is something that goes before the City <br />Council and the Planning staff does not have a copy of what it would say at this point. <br />However, the Commission could within its recommendation have some language that <br />they take this into consideration when looking at the growth management agreement. <br />Commissioner Allen said this could be one thing, but her idea is not to have 93 single <br />family homes built and no Sunflower Hill development. This is not a project she wants to <br />approve. <br />Commissioner Brown said a couple of speakers mentioned the fact that there are <br />700 families on the wait list out of a population of 70,000. He thinks the staff report <br />pointed out a number of sections in the General Plan such as Policy 9 in the Housing <br />Element; Support the development of housing for persons with special needs; Promote <br />the provision of affordable and special needs housing as far as the DSP; and they <br />quoted a dozen different references. Therefore, he said the Planning Commission's role <br />is to ensure the project moving forth is consistent with the General Plan and he knows <br />this requires a General Plan Amendment to change land use. <br />In terms of the other overarching elements in the General Plan is one of land use. He <br />said he agrees with staff's recommendation that it is in compliance with the purpose of <br />the General Plan and also in compliance with the priority that Council has set as a work <br />priority to find a home for Sunflower Hill and it is not like Sunflower Hill has not looked <br />for other options. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 10, 2016 Page 25 of 33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.