Laserfiche WebLink
would also emphasize the fact that this is Irby Ranch, and he asked for Mr. Serpa's <br />comments. <br />Mr. Serpa said he completely understands this suggestion from a drive -by perspective; <br />however, many other variables include the fact that they would like to create a <br />farmstead park. The oak tree has a massive dripline and nothing can be built in this. <br />They decided to preserve the oak tree and make a park out of it with developed space, <br />benches and gathering places in front of it to celebrate the tree. To make a home next <br />to it would almost be overdoing it. <br />The problem is the circulation on the other side inside the community where there would <br />be traffic on their private street which becomes an impact. If they place it along Nevada <br />Street, there is parking, it will be its own structure sitting in its own farmstead with a <br />decorative fence and landscaping with open space around it. The realignment of the <br />intersection moved it and the view is much more direct than it was before, so they think <br />they have chosen a good location for it. <br />Commissioner Nagler stated there are several home sites between Stanley Boulevard <br />and the site proposed. <br />Mr. Serpa pointed to the lower left corner of the intersection and said they have a deep <br />landscape setback. When coming down Stanley either way there is a fairly direct view of <br />the farmstead. <br />Commissioner Brown thanked Mr. Serpa for showing him the massing and for <br />demonstrating how the project is different from the development at Safeway. He asked <br />for an explanation of what seems to be a gap for the last three homes on D Street <br />shown in Sheet L -4. <br />Mr. Serpa explained there are three homes at the end of the street. The home on the <br />end connects to a sidewalk directly to the left of it and across the street. It is the next <br />two homes in that do not have a sidewalk in front and, from a builder's standpoint, they <br />can put the sidewalks in front of them but this will take 5 feet from the backyards. <br />Typically, homebuyers will want 5 feet more in their backyard and no sidewalk in front if <br />given the choice, but they will do whatever the City requires. <br />Commissioner Brown said his personal preference would be for the connection and <br />requirement for a sidewalk. Lastly, there is comment in the staff report that the fact that <br />the design template was based on the design from the DSP and part of it has porches <br />and other things. He noticed that C -3 is the only home that stands out as not being <br />consistent with this design. <br />Mr. Serpa said all of the plans are different widths, different sizes and this provides a <br />better look for the entire street scene. They are not finished with the details of the C -3 <br />plan and while they may see changes with it, structurally he thinks it fits in well with their <br />product mix. <br />Susan Houghton, President of the Board of Directors for Sunflower Hill, thanked City <br />staff for their work and the Commission for its due diligence on this project. She had a <br />presentation ready for tonight but will not give it due to questions and comments voiced <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 10, 2016 Page 12 of 33 <br />