My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 071316
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 071316
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:45:49 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:35:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/13/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Balch: We do but it gives discretion and you take it away. Okay, so how <br />do we condition that the story poles will be added before it goes to Council for their <br />consent or approval? <br />Weinstein: Just add the condition. We have a month before Council so it seems like <br />that's sufficient for story poles? <br />Carey: We also had the discussion about the photo montage that we did before that that <br />was another option; it's the virtual flyover. <br />Commissioner Balch: I think though at this point, I will speak for me, but for me it <br />sounds like there's enough interest from neighbors that the story poles will be <br />something that we should do. <br />Chair Ritter: It helps the neighbors. <br />Commissioner Balch: I'll start with that and before I make the motion, I want to say that <br />the conversation about keeping the house that was on the lot versus not, that <br />conversation was held during a workshop pretty extensively and that's probably why it <br />wasn't mentioned here so much. I will tell you from my quick read, the house is in <br />disrepair and I personally, based on the reports that were generated, you know, I <br />apologize that this is a turning page in the City's history as something of personal <br />significance to you, but the report shows it has no citywide historical value. I hate to say <br />that. <br />Commissioner Nagler: It's on a personal level, but not citywide. <br />Commissioner Balch: Yeah, so that was discussed and I saw it from my notes here as a <br />comment for the speaker. So I just wanted to mention. <br />Beaudin: We'd like to make the story poles a recommendation from the Commission <br />rather than conditional approval because it's not the project per se, it's a procedural <br />issue. So what we'd like to suggest is that the Commission make that strong request to <br />the applicant to install those story poles prior to the City Council so that they have that <br />information and then the conditions would be the other things we've already talked <br />about. <br />Amos: Can I make a clarification on this please? If you're asking for story poles, you're <br />asking for each building? Or is it just for the mixed use building? <br />Commissioner Allen: I think all of them. <br />Chair Ritter: I think just number one. It's a corner. <br />Commissioner Balch: Why did you ask for clarification? Why don't we do, doubling the <br />mixed use. I think we're all there on the mixed use. What about Residence 1 as well? <br />So that way the 2 nearest the street, the biggest impacts? <br />Commissioner Nagler: Okay how about that. That'd be great. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, July 13, 2016 Page 31 of 38 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.